Condonation of 1365 days allowed by court
The question was of right to give condonation of delay. Not one or two day but of 1365 days.
In this judgment the court allowed the CoD.
citatio
M/s royal sanitation Vs Comm of commercial tax
Citations
M/s Anil Enterprises v. Commissioner of Commercial
Tax, U.P. Lucknow
Postmaster General & Ors. v. Living Media India Limited and Another
- Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy reported in (1998) 7 SCC 123 Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag and Another v. Mst. Katiji and Others
Facts
- Whether the Tribunal was legally justified in condoning the delay of 1365 days in filing the appeal of revenue before the Tribunal contrary to the decision of Supreme court in the matter of Chief Post Master General & Ors Vs. Living Media India Ltd. and Anr and State of M.P. Vs. Bhure Lal?”
Observation
- In light of the above, I am of the view that the delay is explained by the authorities and the appeal is required to be heard by the Tribunal, as so much time has already elapsed. I am also of the view that the hearing of the appeal should be expedited. Accordingly, the Tribunal is directed to hear and decide the appeal within four months from date.
- With the aforesaid observations, the revision petition is disposed of
Read/DL copy of judgment-
