ConsultEase Logo
Now live: ConsultEase AppExpert advice, on demand
Know more
App Store
Google Play
App Logo

Counsel was wearing vests while in video conferencing, What high court said?

📋
Back to all articles

Case Covered:

Lalaram S/o Shyojiram, By Caste Gurjar

Versus

State Of Rajasthan

Facts of the case:

Learned counsel for the petitioner was contacted through video conferencing he was found to be wearing Baniyan. This court has already observed that during this pandemic where court functioning is being done through video conferencing, lawyers must appear in proper uniform. Even through video conferencing a decorum of the court is required to be maintained. The Advocates Act provides for lawyers to wear a uniform while pleading the case for their clients.

Order:

Keeping in view that the petitioner’s counsel was not in proper uniform, this matter is adjourned.

List this case again on 5th May 2020.

Download the copy:

Counsel was wearing vests while in video conferencing, What high court said?

 

C

Written by

ConsultEase

ConsultEase is a verified expert on the ConsultEase platform specialising in GST Litigation. Connect via the app for personalised advice on your specific situation.

View on ConsultEase