GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Condonation in filing of appeal for genuine problem in checking GSTN dashboard (Pdf Attach)
Cases Covered: SRM Engineering Construction Corporation Limited vs. the Assistant Commissioner Citations: 1. Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU, Kakinada and others Vs. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited Facts of the cases: A notice was issued to the applicant for the difference in GSTR 1
Case 5 which become the reason for first amendment in Constitution of India
Introduction- The province of Madras had issued a government order for reservation in medical seats. The applicant tried to get admission in one of the colleges but was denied due to her caste. She was aggrieved by this and applied to the court. Provisions in
The order to freeze account was set aside by Court (Pdf Attach)
Cases Covered: M/S. JBB APPARELS PVT. LTD Vs PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE AND ANR. Facts of the cases: The appellant’s bank accounts were freezed. They went to get it unfreezed Observation & Judgement of the court: There was a batch of petitions,
Any rectification, which adversely affects any person is possible only after following the principles of natural justice
Cases Covered: S.P.Y Agro Industrial Limited VS Union of India Facts of the cases: The petitioner failed to submit its returns in GSTR-3B for the months of January 2020 to June 2020 and as such, the petitioner was directed to file fresh returns within 15
Taxon domestic crude increased
On Friday, the government implemented changes in its fiscal policies. Notably, the special additional excise duty (SAED) for crude petroleum was raised to Rs 12,100 per tonne, effective from September 30. This adjustment followed the recent fortnightly review on September 15, during which the windfall
Section 62 doesn’t give power to impose penalty(Pdf Attach)
Cases Covered: S.P.Y Agro Industrial Limited VS Union of India Facts of the cases: The petitioner failed to submit its returns in GSTR-3B for the months of January 2020 to June 2020 and as such, the petitioner was directed to file fresh returns within 15
ITC denied for non payment of tax by supplier(Pdf Attach)
Cases Covered: M/s.Jai Balaji Paper Cones VS The Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax, Facts of the cases: The petitioner made the payment of tax and invoice value to the seller. But the amount was not paid by the seller to the government. The department asked the
E-way bill lapsed but necessary documents were available (Pdf Attach)
Cases Covered: Western Carrier India Ltd, Vs State Of U.P. Facts of the cases: In a recent judgment the Allahabad high court has waived off the penalty levied u/s 129 of CGST Act. The vehicle was transporting the goods for Tata Steel. In the way
Case-4 101 historical cases which changed India. Doctrine of basic structure of Constitution of India.
Cases Covered: Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr We all understand that the government of India has the right to amend the Constitution of India. But can they amend everything. Can they change all the fundamental rights given in constitution?
Online gamers decided to go to the court against notices by GST
The online gamers have decided to approach the court. Recently major online gaming companies received hafety notices from the department. The total amount of this litigation is expected to the tune of 1,50,000 crores. But the online gaming companies are denying the liability. They are
Hybrid mode of hearing for all benches, said Gujarat high court(Pdf Attach)
As a result of this development, individuals can now participate in court proceedings at the Gujarat High Court either in person or virtually, using video conference technology. The hybrid system, which was initially introduced as a ‘pilot project’ for four division benches of the High
Account of doctor banned for posting against Himalaya
The account of Doctor Liver is banned by the court for posting defamatory content against Himalaya Wellness. The appellant told the court that the purpose of all those posts was to push the products of competitors. They requested In the facts and circumstances issue an



