GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
No provision under the GST which mandates that the goods shall not be sold at prices below the MRP.
Introduction: In a Writ Petition filed before the High Court of Kerala by Alfa Group [2020 (34) G.S.T.L 142] During the course of the transportation of goods by the Petitioner, the vehicle was intercepted by the Proper Officer due to fact Invoice found to be
Summary of major Indirect Tax Case Laws
Summary of major Indirect Tax Case Laws GST A. GST: Refund claim on the export of goods from 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2017 allowed even though drawback availed. The revenue rejected refund of IGST paid on the export of goods on the ground of simultaneous availment of
Kerala High Court in the case of Alfa Group
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1941 WP(C).No.30798 OF 2019(Y) PETITIONER: ALFA GROUP MANACKAL BUILDING, KOLADATHU JUNCTION, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA 690 502 REPRESENTED BY ABHILASH AYYAPPAN,
Electricity distribution is a composite supply with other activities
Case Covered: Torrent Power Ltd Versus Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: The Appellant, Torrent Power Limited (TPL) is a company formed under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The Appellant is the distribution licensee
Gujarat High Court in the case of Torrent Power Ltd.
Citations: Haridas Das Vs Usha Rani Banik (smt) &Ors Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited Vs. Mawasi&Ors M/s Northen India Caterers (India) Ltd Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi Kamlesh Verma Vs. Mayawati & Ors Saw Chandra Kante Vs. Sheikh Habib M/s Thungabhadra Industries Ltd
Fresh provisional attachment under GST
Case Covered: M/s. Amazonite Steel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., M/s. Corandum Impex Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., M/s. Cuprite Marketing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Versus Union of India & Ors. Facts of the Case: 1. On 5th June 2018, the Additional Director General, Directorate General of
The limitation of all cases is extended until further order.
ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL-W S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No(s).3/2020 IN RE : COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION Date : 23-03-2020
Authorities undertaking Provisional Attachment beyond 1 year without Informing Bank is Contrary to Law: Calcutta HC
Case Covered: M/s. Amazonite Steel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Versus Union of India & Ors. Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: The grievances raised and issues involved in all the six writ petitions are common, and accordingly, they were
Calcutta High Court in the case of M/s. Amazonite Steel Pvt. Ltd.
Citations: Falguni Chakraborti Vs. The State of West Bengal and Others Indian National Congress (I) Vs. Institute of Social Welfare and Others CIT Bombay Vs. Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing Company Ltd State of Jharkhand and others Vs. Ambay Cements and another PML Industries Ltd. Vs.
West Bengal AAR Order in the case of ABB lndia Ltd
Citations: Solid and Correct Engineering Works Virdi Brothers TTG lndustries Ltd S/S Triveni N L Ltd Triveni Engineering & lndustries Ltd RFE Solar Pvt Ltd Notification No. 1212017 – Central Tax (Rate) Section 2(119) of the GST Act Section 2(52) of the GST Act
12% GST on Composite Supply of Works Contract for Metro & Monorail: AAR
Case Covered: ABB India Ltd Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: ln the context of a metro corridor, SCADA, according to the Applicant, describes a system that controls and monitors the electrical network of the metro system and provides
Limitation extended for all prospective litigation across the country.
ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL-W S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No(s).3/2020 IN RE : COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION Date :



