Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
Gujarat HC in the case of M/s Surat Mercantile Association Versus Union of India
Case Covered: M/s Surat Mercantile Association Versus Union of India Oral Order: We have heard Shri Vinay Shraff along with Shri Parth Shah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, and Shri Chintan Dave learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.3. Connect with Special Civil Application
Can both SGST and then CGST proceed with proceedings for same offence and arrest?
Can both SGST and then CGST proceed with proceedings for same offence and arrest? We have filed a petition before the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court against such an act of CGST. Brief Facts Allegation of the department that petitioner is involved in operating multiple firms.
Dr. Avinash PoddarDec 8, 2020Kerala HC in the case of Loafers Corner Cafe Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Loafers Corner Cafe Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The petitioner, which is a partnership firm, has approached this Court aggrieved by the delay occasioned by the respondent in cancelling an earlier registration and granting him a new registration under the
Instruction No. 4/3/2020-GST
Instruction No. 4/3/2020-GST To, The Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All) The Pr. Director General, DG (Systems) Madam/Sir, Sub: Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for verification of taxpayers granted deemed registration – regarding With effect from 21.08.2020, rule 9 of the Central
24×7 Availability of Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) System: RBI
The Chairman / Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer of member banks participating in RTGS Madam / Dear Sir, 24×7 Availability of Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) System A reference is invited to the Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated October 09, 2020, wherein Reserve
Delhi HC in the case of V. M. Singh Versus Madan Lal Mangotra
Case Covered: V. M. Singh Versus Madan Lal Mangotra Facts of the Case: Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 26.10.2020 whereby the Trial Court has directed the listing of the matter for physical hearing and the applications filed by learned counsel for the petitioner
Supreme Court in the case of Gajendra Sharma Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Gajendra Sharma Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: By this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for directions declaring the notification dated 27.03.2020 issued by the Reserve Bank of India as ultra vires to the
Changes In External Trade Procedure
Changes In External Trade Procedure Four important procedural announcements by RBI for exports sectors: 1. Direct Dispatch of Shipping Documents Presently, AD Category – I banks (AD banks) are permitted to regularise cases where dispatch of shipping documents was made by the exporter directly to
CA VMV S RAODec 5, 2020External Trade – Facilitation – Export of Goods and Services: RBI
External Trade – Facilitation – Export of Goods and Services: RBI To, All Category – I Authorised Dealer Banks Madam / Sir, External Trade – Facilitation – Export of Goods and Services Please refer to the Statement on Development and Regulatory Policies announced as part
Circular No. 20/2020: CBDT
Circular No. 20/2020 Subject: Income-Tax Deduction from Salaries during the Financial Year 2020-21 under Section 192 of the Income Tax Acr, 1961. Reference is invited to Circular No. 4/2020 dated 16.01.2020 whereby the rates of deduction of income tax from the payment of income under
How to Sell on Amazon?
How to sell on Amazon? How to create a seller’s account on Amazon? So you’ve decided to start selling on Amazon? Perhaps you’re creating an online store from scratch, or merely transferring & expanding your existing business. Whatever the case may be, there are a
Supreme Court in the case of Jayant Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Case Covered: Jayant Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh Facts of the Case: Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 11.05.2020 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore in M.Cr.C No. 49338/2019 and M.Cr.C. No. 49972/2019, the original petitioner as well as the State of Madhya Pradesh have preferred the present appeals. By the impugned common judgment and order, the High Court has dismissed the aforesaid applications filed under Section 482
CA Shafaly GirdharwalDec 4, 2020