Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
GST LitigationSC express concern over electoral bonds
During the concluding session of arguments in the case pertaining to the Electoral Bonds Scheme, the Supreme Court raised a critical question to the Union Government. They inquired whether there were intentions to amend the Companies Act to reintroduce a profit percentage-based limit on corporate
Section 9 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 9 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: (1) Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the
Section -7 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 7 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: In every case in which an offender is punishable with imprisonment which may be of either description, it shall be competent to the Court which sentences such offender
FIR & BailCourt denied the bail for apprehension of illegal detail/arrest of appellant
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: ASHISH MITTAL Vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR Citations: Union of India vs. Kunisetty Satyanarayana Special Director vs. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse Kirit Shrimankar vs. Union of India, Virbhadra Singh vs. Enforcement Directorate & Ors. State of
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 2, 2023Section -4 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 4 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: The punishments to which offenders are liable under the provisions of this Sanhita are— (a) Death; (b) Imprisonment for life, that is to say, imprisonment for remainder of
Contracts & DisputesThe reply of taxpayer should be considered before passing the order (Pdf Attach)
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/s.The Chennai Silks, Vs The Assistant Commissioner Facts of the cases: The respondent sent a reminder DRC-01A on 10.3.2022. Thereafter, DRC-01 show cause notice dated 17.4.2023 was issued and the personal hearing was fixed on
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 2, 2023
FIR & BailWhy SC rejected the bail of Ex. Delhi CM , Manish Sisodia even when he is not proven guilty yet
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: MANISH SISODIA Vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Citations: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and Others v. Union of India and Others Ravinder Singh v. State of Haryana Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan Y. Balaji v. Karthik Desari
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 2, 2023
FIR & BailBail granted to Chartered Accountant in PMLA Case
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: MANISH KOTHARI Vs DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPT. OF REVENUE HEADQUARTER INVESTIGATION UNIT Citations: Sanjay Pandey v. Directorate of Enforcement2022 SCC Ranjit Singh Brahamjeet Singh Sharma v. State of Maharastra Mohd. Muslim Hussain vs.
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 2, 2023
FIR & BailJudgment of Pankaj Bansal for ground of arrest in PMLA is applicable retrospectively
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Roop Bansal Vs Union of India and another Citations: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Versus Union of India & Ors Pankaj Bansal Versus Union of India and others Arnab Manoranjan Goswami versus State of Maharashtra and others Union
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 2, 2023Section -3 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 1 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to the same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: (1) Throughout this Sanhita every definition of an offence, every penal provision, and every Illustration of every such definition or penal provision shall be understood subject to
GST ConsultancyBenefit of amnesty should be provided even if after or before the period given in scheme
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/s.GMR Enterprises Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, Citations: Tvl.Suguna Cut piece Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner Facts of the cases: A writ was filed to quash the cancellation of registration. This writ petition is filed for writ
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 2, 2023
GST LitigationThe notice is returned as unclaimed, it shall be deemed to be served
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: PRIYANKA KUMARI V/s SHAILENDRA KUMAR Citations: K.Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Another, Ajeet Seeds Limited Vs. K. Gopala Krishnaiah Facts of the cases: A notice was sent to the petitioner. But it was not received
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 2, 2023