ConsultEase Logo
Now live: ConsultEase AppExpert advice, on demand
Know more
App Store
Google Play
App Logo

SC in the case of Amit Jain Versus Union of India

📋
Back to all articles

Case Covered:

Amit Jain

Versus

Union of India

Facts of the case:

The respondent-Institute (Institute of Chartered Accountants of India) has agreed to notify on the website about the steps taken by the Institute in reference to the concerns expressed by the candidates through this writ petition.

Observations:

Most of the issues have been addressed by the Institute and steps taken including corrective measures. That be notified by way of a press release/notification, to be displayed on the official website of the respondent- Institute. Beyond this nothing more is required to be said in this order.

Order:

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

SC in the case of Amit Jain Versus Union of India

C

Written by

ConsultEase

ConsultEase is a verified expert on the ConsultEase platform specialising in GST Litigation. Connect via the app for personalised advice on your specific situation.

View on ConsultEase