Case Covered: Apeejay Infra-Logistics Private Limited Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The Petitioner, a private Container Freight Station [hereinafter referred to as ‘CFS’] at Haldia, West Bengal, challenges Regulation 5(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 and also
Case Covered: JSK Sons Versus State of Gujarat Facts of the Case: By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs : “(A) Your Lordship may be pleased to admit this petition: (B) Your Lordship may be pleased issue a writ of mandamus or any other appointment writ, order, and/or directions in the nature of mandamus, quashing and setting aside the provisional order of attachment said to have been issued by Respondent No.2 for attaching the Bank Accounts, as per the Table mentioned herein above at para
Compendium of Notifications and Circulars Post COVID- MCA: DTPA CA Narendra Kumar Goyal President – DTPA MCA Circulars General Circular No. 10 /2020 To, All Stakeholders, Subject: Clarification regarding the spending of CSR funds for COVID-19. Ma’am/Sir, Keeping in view of the spread of the
FAQs on GSTR 3b- Every registered person is required to fill the details of their supplies. It is required to make the payment of correct tax to the government. Here we have compiled the FAQs on GSTR 3b. It is a return required to be
Compendium of Notifications and Circulars Post COVID- GST CA Narendra Kumar Goyal President – DTPA CGST Circulars Circular No.133 03/2020-GST To, The Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners of Central Tax (All) / The Principal Director Generals/ Director Generals (All) Madam/Sir, Sub: Clarification in respect
Short tax paid in Form GSTR-3B of F.Y. 2017-18 and Excess tax paid in Form GSTR-3B of F.Y. 2018-19 and effect of the same given in F.Y. 2019-20 (Assuming). Herewith I giving with an example for your better understanding. Illustration-9. “ M/s. Raheem Corporation” doing
Short tax paid in F.Y.2017-18 and F.Y.2018-19 both years, Effect of the same given in F.Y. 2019-20 (Assuming). Herewith I giving with an example for your better understanding. Illustration-8. “ M/s. Surjeet Enterprises, Ludhiana ” doing business in the wholesale and retail business. They had
Case Covered: Mr. Navneet Sahay Verma Versus Registrar of Companies Facts of the Case: The Petitioners are directors who have been disqualified. Though the facts in each petition may slightly differ, the common relief sought at this stage by the Petitioners is to permit them
Case Covered: Cial Duty-Free And Retail Services Ltd Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: In writ petition bearing W.P.(C) Nos.6850 of 2018, a declaration has been sought to the effect that the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, the Integrated Goods and
Case Covered: The DCIT Versus Shri Jugal Kishore Garg Facts of the Case: Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a partner in the firms M/s. J.K. Jewellers (3.3.34% shares), M/s. JK Jewellers International (20% shares), M/s. JK Jewells (50% shares), M/s.
