Appellant – Thirumalakonda Plywoods, Respondent – The Assistant Commissioner – State Tax, Anantapur Circle – 1, Anantapuramu Division Facts- The petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus declaring (a) Section 16(4) of APGST Act, 2017 and Section 16(4) of CGST Act, is violative of Article
In this judgement a SCN was sent to the taxpayer. Instead of going to the appeal the appellant went to the court. A writ under article 226 of Constitution of India was filed. The contention of taxpayer was that the SCN in vague. No details
In the fast-paced world of financial advising, where time is of the essence and client satisfaction is paramount, virtual assistants play a crucial role. These skilled professionals bring a unique set of abilities to the table, helping financial advisors streamline their operations, enhance client experiences,
Appellant- Advance system Respondent- THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CGST Two important observations of the Delhi high court related to refunds Q-1 Whether the applicant is required to file the refund application once it is granted in Appeal? Q-2 Whether the Officer can raise
In today’s competitive business landscape, outsourcing accounting and financial services has emerged as a strategic solution for companies seeking cost savings and specialized expertise. By delegating these crucial tasks to external professionals, businesses can streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and focus on core competencies. This article
Stocks as a whole can be confusing to navigate as a beginner. Especially when every expert out there is trying to use some “stock lingo”. Sometimes it helps, but sometimes all it does is intimidate you. Yes, we do understand, and that is why we
Petitioner- Diwakar Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Respondent-Commissioner of CGST and anr. 2020 Court- Punjab & Haryana (Chandigarh) In this case, the input credit ledger of the taxpayer was blocked. A search was conducted at the business place and the director was carried to the respondent’s office.
Judgement- M/s Radha Krishan Industries Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Court- Supreme Court of India This judgement is cited in many judgements later on. Three important issues were addressed in this judgement. C.1 Maintainability of the writ petition before the High Court C.2
GTAs can exercise GST under forward charge for a financial year without filing declarations for future years unless they revert to RCM. Such declaration is to be exercised till 31st March of the preceding Financial Year instead of 15th March. GST @5% on food served
Petitioner-Agrawal and Brothers Respondent – Union of India, Western Railway Division DRM Office, Ratlam and Office of the Superintendent, CGST, and 2. Central Excise, Range-I Division Ratlam, Court- Madhya Pradesh (Indore). Every buyer was aggrieved by the defaults of suppliers. The department was trying to
