Cases Covered: Ravinder Nath Sharma@ Ravubder Sharm vs Union of India Facts of the cases: Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant has been arrested
Cases Covered: M/S VISHWANATH TRADERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Facts of the cases: In this case the Patna high court was approached by the petitioner. They received a notice but the date for filing an appeal was already gone. They couldn’t tell any
Cases Covered: SARVESH MATHURÂ VERSUS THE REGISTRAR GENERAL Facts of the cases: The petitioner, representing themselves in court, expresses dissatisfaction with the underutilization of Video Conferencing infrastructure established by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The petitioner alleges that the High Court has completely discontinued
Cases Covered: M/s Margo Brush India and others Vs State of U.P. and another Facts of the cases: It is a case in which the goods in transit were accompanied by proper documents. When show cause notice was issued to the driver of the vehicle,
A discussion revolves around whether an SEZ Unit, that has not exited from a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), is eligible to clear capital goods under the Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) Scheme, as governed by Rule 74(4) of the SEZ Rules, 2006, when transferring them
