Comment There were differences in various documents but that was corrected by the taxpayer. In case the correct documents are presented before the authorized before passing the order then it should be accepted by the authorities. Details of the case Citation M/S Axpress Logistics India
Non-incorporating the details of the shipping bills in the GSTR-1 would not result in denial of Refund claim if taxpayer in possession of Shipping Bills Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in case of Mr. Sunil Kumar Poddar Versus The Additional Commissioner (Appeal), Siliguri Appeal Comissionerate &
Introduction: The case of Abdus Sami Saifi v. Union of India and Ors. [Civil Writ Petition No. 892/2024] recently came before the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, raising crucial questions regarding the validity of Notification No. 53/2023 dated November 2, 2023, and provisions of Section 107(4)
Comment The specific case of the petitioner is that there is no allegation against the petitioner but the entire allegation has been made against the supplier from whom the petitioner procured the goods. Details of the case Citation M/S. Shiv Enterprises Vs. State of Punjab
Comment The petition filed challenging the constitutional validity of Anti profiteering provisions of GST is hereby quashed by the SC. The provisions of anti profiteering are upheld by the supreme court. Details of the image Citation Cadila Healthcare Ltd. &Anr. vs. CCI & Ors.,
Introduction: The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has taken proactive steps to resume Bill of Entry filing services following the incorporation of budget-related changes in the Customs Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) system. CBIC’s Response to Budget-Related Changes: In response to recent budget
