Sign In

Browse By

Measures recommended by GST Council to curb fake dealers/invoice rackets notified

Press Release

Measures recommended by GST Council to curb fake dealers/invoice rackets notified

In-Person Verification Must For GST Registration, Identification of bogus dealers through data analytics and suspension

Mandatory 1% GST payment for those risky dealers and fly-by-night operators who show unusual large turnovers and have no financial credibility

New Delhi: Now GST registrations will have in-person verification before registration is granted to any applicant. The government has notified on Tuesday the recommendations of the Law Committee of the GST Council in order to control the menace of GST fake invoice frauds that has resulted so far in the arrest of 164 fraudsters including 5 Chartered Accountants and a woman in a nationwide drive over a month, besides booking 1768 cases against 5745 GSTIN entities.

The Law Committee recommendation as notified are central to four key themes, namely- (i) tightening of the verification process for new registration (ii) suspension based on data analytics and mismatches (iii) minimum cash payment to deter dummy businesses and (iv) ease of doing business and precise targeting in the interest of small business intelligently protected.

The notified measures, as approved by the GST Implementation Committee (GIC) and deliberated among the 10 States’ members and the Centre’s representatives in the GSTC’s Law Committee during several rounds of discussion, would help on the one hand to tackle the menace of fake invoices for availing and passing on of input tax credit (ITC) by fraudsters and simultaneously, on the other hand, would ensure that there is no impact on the Ease of Doing Business which is achieved in GST through liberal registration, refund regime and self-compliance system with little or no manual checks.

The major recommendation of the Law Committee of GST Council is for controlling the fresh or new registration taken by the applicants without business purpose and for weeding out the existing fake dealers from the systems. Measures, hence, notified towards systemic tightening of new registration by identifying fake dealers, modifications in the registration process, use of Aadhaar during registration and Aadhaar like capturing of details during registration would impact the menace of mushrooming fake firms and ITC fraud by fly-by-night operators.

Verification of New Registration: Under these measures as per the notifications, now there must be in-person verification before registration is granted to an applicant. Further, in case an applicant opts for Aadhaar authentication, he will undergo biometric-based Aadhaar authentication at one of the Facilitation Centres notified by the Commissioner.

In case, the applicant has not opted for Aadhaar authentication, then for processing the application, biometric information, and verification of KYC documents must be undertaken at the Verification Centres. This verification process may also include taking photographs and verifying the original documents of the applicant uploaded with the registration application. This amendment will come into effect from a date to be notified in near future after setting up of facilitation centers on the lines of Passport Seva Kendras or Aadhaar Seva Kendras.

In effect, GST is moving in the direction of a better verification regime for the registration of new businesses with most steps taken in an automated environment. The new timeline for grant of registration for the Aadhaar authenticated applicant is now 7 days for proper scrutiny of the application. To counter the cases of fake invoices, in a few risky cases where a person has successfully undergone Aadhaar authentication, some additional physical verification may be carried out with the approval of an officer, authorized by the Commissioner. The timeline for grant of registration in such cases would now be of 30 days.

Cancellation and Suspension: In the new regime notified, the suspension and cancellations would be based on data analytics and mismatches. Registration now is also liable for cancellation where the input tax credit is availed in violation of provisions of the CGST Act or the details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 are in excess of the outward supplies declared in FORM GSTR-3B, for one or more tax periods. Such cases lead to ITC being passed or availed without payment of tax and would, therefore, be liable for cancellation of registration. During the proceedings of cancellation, these taxpayers would remain suspended.

During the comparison of GSTR-3B with GSTR-1 and GSTR-2B of a registered person if the parameters indicate significant differences, then the registration may be suspended and proceedings may be started for cancellation of registration. However, the suspension of registration issued under this rule may be revoked by the proper officer in case the difference is justified by the registered person. Such suspension would be applicable with immediate effect to prevent passing on of fake input tax credit.

Minimum Cash Payment: In another significant change in the Rules to deter dummy businesses, the present eligibility limit of availing 10% input tax credit (ITC) by a registered person in respect of invoices where the details have not been furnished by his suppliers would be reduced to 5 percent w.e.f. 1 st January 2021, as consequent to the implementation of QRMP scheme with the facility of IFF, it will be possible for small and medium suppliers to upload invoices monthly while filing return quarterly. This would ensure that large taxpayers continue to procure from small taxpayers.

To curb fake ITC availment and passing on of such credit by unscrupulous persons who generally pay no tax in cash, particularly in those risky cases where GST turnover does not match with the income tax returns and where the value of taxable supply other than exempt supply and zero-rated supply in a month exceeds Rs. 50 lakh, such registered person will not be able to use the amount of ITC available in electronic credit ledger to discharge his liability towards output tax in excess of 99 percent of such tax liability. At least 1% liability would need to be discharged in cash. This change will come into effect from 1 st January 2021.

Ease of Doing Business & Precise Targeting: However, there are some exemptions to the above provision of limiting ITC utilization to ensure Ease of Doing Business. Accordingly, where a taxpayer has paid more than Rs. 1 lakh as income tax in each of the last two financial years or has received a refund of unutilized ITC on account of zero-rated supply or inverted duty structure of more than Rs 1 lakh in the preceding financial year or has discharged his liability towards output tax through the electronic cash ledger for an amount in excess of 1% of the total output tax liability, cumulatively till that tax period. Such taxpayers can use more than 99% ITC to discharge tax liability. Further, the Government Departments, the Public Sector Undertakings, local authorities, and/or statutory bodies, are exempted from this limit on ITC utilization.

Therefore, the Ease of Doing Business for genuine taxpayers, business entities, and traders and Precise Targeting in the interest of small businesses would not be impacted as the Law Committee has suggested measures on precise identification of potentially riskier taxpayers based on very well defined parameters run on the automated environment. In the same spirit, furthermore, to control the fake invoice menace, now if a registered person has not filed Form GSTR-3B for two preceding months then his Form GSTR-1 will not be generated. A similar restriction has been placed for QRMP taxpayers if the Form GSTR-3B is not filed for the preceding one tax period of 3 months.

Collectively these steps are likely to control dummy registrations and fake billing for ITC to take the GST process towards a cleaner and robust regime.

Measures recommended by GST Council to curb fake dealers/invoice rackets

Profile photo of ConsultEase Administrator ConsultEase Administrator

Consultant

Faridabad, India

As a Consultease Administrator, I'm responsible for the smooth administration of our portal. Reach out to me in case you need help.

Discuss Now
Opinions & information presented by ConsultEase Members are their own.