M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Table of Contents
Car Chassis Carriers Private Limited & anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner, College Street and Sealdah Charge
The department sent a communication to the appellant to reverse the ITC because the registration of the supplier was canceled. But the details of the supplier1 were not mentioned in the email.
The honorable court said -In our view, the procedure adopted by the authority for directing reversal of the input tax credit and thereafter compelling the appellants to pay the amount is not sustainable in the eye of law but will be in violation of the principles of natural justice. Therefore, we are fully convinced that the manner in which the respondent authority directed the appellants to reverse the input tax credit by way of an email dated 20th December, 2022 is not tenable in law
[pdf_attachment file=”1″ name=”optional file name”]
Recieve the most important tips and updates
Absolutely Free! Unsubscribe anytime.
We adhere 100% to the no-spam policy.