Table of Contents
M/S VISHWANATH TRADERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
In this case the Patna high court was approached by the petitioner. They received a notice but the date for filing an appeal was already gone. They couldn’t tell any reason for the delay. Although the court can accept the writ in an appropriate case even if the alternate remedy is available. But in this case the court dismissed the writ. The petitioner approached the Supreme Court
The honorable Supreme court considering the facts of the case, dismissed the SLP and upheld the decision of Patna High court.
There are multiple judgements where the writ is accepted even when the alternative remedy is available. The court can accept the writ when the proceedings are without jurisdiction, against principles of natural justice or violative of fundamental rights.
But in the present case none of these happened. The petitioner approached the court only because the remedy of appeal has lapsed. They missed it due to gross negligence. Thus the court refused to grant any relief.
[pdf_attachment file=”1″ name=”optional file name”]
Recieve the most important tips and updates
Absolutely Free! Unsubscribe anytime.
We adhere 100% to the no-spam policy.