Sign In

Browse By

Blocked Credit Under Section 17(5)

Blocked Credit Under Section 17(5):

The Orissa High Court 2019-TOIL01088, in the case of Safari Retreats (P) Ltd, which permitted availement of ITC on GST paid on raw materials such Cement, Steel, Sand, Construction Material, Sanitary, Electrical, Wooden items and other tax paid items for construction, development, erection, installation, and commission of Office Complex, Shopping Complex, Cinema Halls, Malls, would be allowable. On appeal by the Department, Supreme Court did not grant a stay and hence, the judgment and principle of law laid down are fully applicable.

2: Hence in the light of the above, the assessee may take credit and utilize the same for payment of tax on output service and in future, if it is held by the Supreme Court that no ITC is available, the ITC, so utilized, shall have to be reversed with interest but no penalty is imposable in view of the fact that ITC has been taken pursuant to the judgement of High Court.

3: At the same time, one more option left with the assessee is to take ITC in the Credit Ledger to avoid limitation as provided under Section 16(4), but do not utilize the same. If in future, the Supreme Court holds that no ITC is available, the assessee will have to at best reverse the credit without any interest as they have not utilized the ITC and obviously, there is no question of imposition of penalty.

4: In Section 17(5)©, the words used are “works construct” service when supplied for “construction” of immovable property”. The words used are “for” and not “ in relation to” –. In my view, the meaning of the word “for” carry restrictive meaning and whereas “in relation to” as used in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, carry very wider and expansive interpretation.

5: Hence, in my humble view, under Section 17(5)©, at the best, what would be restricted is (a) construction materials (b) inputs services (c) capital goods by virtue of immoveable property emerges. After the emergence of civil structure ( which is admittedly an immoveable property), other inputs such as (a) airconditioning (b) electrical equipment (c) sanitary items (c) wooden items (d) elevators & lifts (e) DG Sets (f) Fittings, (g) Painting and Polishing and (h) Post Construction activities, cannot be held to be immoveable but only moveables and, therefore, in my view, there cannot be any bar in taking credit.

6: If we carefully analyze the definition of works contract as given in Section 2(119), it split into construction and other 14 items. Needless to say, Section 17(5)© deny ITC on inputs and input services only where construction results in immovable property but cannot be stretch to deny the ITC on other 13 activities as clearly spelt out in the definition of works contract – Section (119). In my view, activities like Furniture & Fittings and such other similar items in immovable property is not barred.

7: AAR Karnataka in We work India Management P Ltd Ruling 106/2019 allowed ITC on 14mm Engineered wood and Oak Top Wooden Flooring was allowed.

8: AAR Karnataka in Keshav Cements & Infra P Ltd MANU/_AR/0270/2019 had held inputs and input services (except goods as it’s the user is not clear from documents submitted) used for setting up solar power plant ( few km away from the main plant to manufacture cement) for the generation of electricity which is exempt but used captively for the manufacture of finished goods, allowable. Further held that input or inputs answering to the definition of Plant and Machinery as given in 17(5) shall be eligible provided electrical energy is entirely captively consumed and not sold outside.

9: Nipro India Corpn P Ltd AAR Maharashtra 2018(98taxmann.com Page 319).internal finishing work, External Sewerage System, Internal Sewer and venting system, sanitary were and CP fittings, AC Equipment, AC piping work and accessories, Ventilation Fans, Air Distribution System, Automatic Control System, Compressed Air Supply System, Steam Supply System, Process chilled water supply system, purified water supply system, N2 Supply System, Process Wastewater supply system, Local Exhaust System, DG Set, Main Feeder Distribution System, Emergency and Exit light system, telephone system, Lan system, PA address system Light Protection System ( except pure civil work) allowed.

10: Appellate Authority for AAR Orissa MANU/AI/0004/2019 ITC has held that for gardening and plantation within plant area ( even at mining area far outside the factory) and other business establishments will qualify for ITC as it controls pollution and atmospheric temperature.

11: AAR Uttarakhand MANU/AR/0056/2018 has held that ITC on office furniture & fixtures AC plant is allowable in the view of the judgement of CESTAT, New Delhi Bench in Balkrishna Industries Ltd MANU,/CE/0885/2015. AAR is relying on CESTAT judgement and therefore it is completely illogical to ignore the decisions on the same issues, of various High Courts on both Works Contract and Plant and Machinery when the definition of Plant and Machinery is now much enlarged.

12: The ITC on building repairs, maintenance, upkeep would depend upon accounting treatment given to expenses. If expenditure treated as revenue expenditure, ITC would be allowed and if capitalized, no ITC would be allowed. In the case of Rambagh Palace Hotels (P) Ltd, AAR Rajasthan has allowed the ITC on Furniture, Fixtures, etc.etc.

Read the copy:

Blocked Credit Under Section 17(5)

 

Profile photo of Advocate Pradeep Kumar Advocate Pradeep Kumar

PK Mittal BCom Delhi university 1975 LLB Delhi University 1978 FCS Fellow Member of ICSI 1992 1982 to 1992 as CS in Corporate Head Legal Apollo Tyres Ltd 1986 to 1992 1993 onwards Advocate in Delhi High Court CESTAT NCLT = Practcising Indirect Tax and Corporate laws 1993 to till date. Written more than 100 Article on Company Law and Corporate laws Indirect Tax Speaker on Indirect Tax Co Law and IBC in various Seminars Workshop organised by ICAI ICSI and ICMA and other organisations Convenor Core Group on GST of ICSI

Discuss Now
Opinions & information presented by ConsultEase Members are their own.