Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax
Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 50/2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 13th September 2018 G.S.R. …..(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3)
Notification No. 49/2018 – Central Tax
Notification No. 49/2018 – Central Tax Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 49/2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 13th September 2018 G.S.R……(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of
Section 17(5) – Blocked Credits
Section 17(5) – Blocked Credits Some amendments have been made in the Sections 17(5)(a) and 17(5)(b) of CGST Act, 2017. The section 17(5) is the section for the blocked credit under GST. Changes regarding the same have been mentioned and analyzed below: 1. Comparison –
GST late fee waiver scheme launched and GSTR1 filing date extended
GST late fee waiver scheme launched and GSTR1 filing date extended It has been observed that the number of taxpayers who have filed FORM GSTR-3B is substantially higher than the number of taxpayers who have furnished FORM GSTR-1. Non-furnishing of FORM GSTR-1 is liable to
Notification No. 48 /2018 – Central Tax
Notification No. 48 /2018 – Central Tax Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 48 /2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 10th September 2018 G.S.R……(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section
Notification No. 47/2018 – Central Tax
Notification No. 47/2018 – Central Tax Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 47/2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 10th September 2018 G.S.R…..(E),– In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the
Notification No. 46/2018 – Central Tax
Notification No. 46/2018 – Central Tax Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 46/2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 10th September 2018 G.S.R…..(E),– In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of the
Notification No. 45/2018 – Central Tax
Notification No. 45/2018 – Central Tax Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 45/2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 10th September 2018 G.S.R…..(E),– In exercise of the powers conferred by section 168 of
Notification No. 44/2018 – Central Tax
Notification No. 44/2018 – Central Tax Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 44/2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 10th September 2018 G.S.R……(E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso
Notification No. 43/2018 – Central Tax
Notification No. 43/2018 – Central Tax Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 43/2018 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 10th September 2018 G.S.R……(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of
Exemption Notifications must be interpreted strictly
Exemption Notifications must be interpreted strictly: The Supreme Court Constitution Bench Judgment Gist: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“SC”)- Constitution Bench of Five Judges in the case of Commissioner of Customs (Import) Mumbai Vs. M/s Dilip Kumar and Company and Ors have held that
Declaration u/s 138 is Mandatory in case of Delivery Challan: High Court
Declaration u/s 138 is Mandatory in case of Delivery Challan: High Court The case was raised in front of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam. The court says, that the Declaration u/s 138 is Mandatory in case of Delivery Challan. M/S.INDUS TOWERS LIMITED Versus. THE



