GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
SC Order in the case of Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private Limited
Case Covered: Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private Limited Versus Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Facts of the Case: The short but important questions, that arise for consideration in this batch of matters are as under: (i) As to whether any creditor including the Central Government,
Delhi HC in the case of Back Office IT Solutions Private Limited Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Back Office IT Solutions Private Limited Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: Mr. Puneet Agrawal, who appears on behalf of the petitioner company, says that, although several grievances and resultant reliefs have been sought, in the instant writ petition, for the
Gujarat HC Order in the case of M/s Sanganer Enviro Project Development Versus State of Gujarat
Case Covered: M/s Sanganer Enviro Project Development Versus State of Gujarat Oral Order: By way of a present petition under Articles 226, 227, and 14 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) That the Hon’ble Court be pleased to
Supreme Court in the case of Kiran Devi Versus The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board
Case Covered: Kiran Devi Versus The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board Facts of the Case: The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna dated 6.2.2013 whereby a writ petition filed by respondent No. 41
CESTAT Delhi Order in the case of Baldeep Singh V/s. Commissioner of Customs
Case Covered: Baldeep Singh Versus Commissioner of Customs Facts of the Case: The issue in this appeal is whether the show cause notice was validly served on the appellant which is a condition precedent for giving jurisdiction to the Adjudicating Authority to pass an order.
Madras HC in the case of M/s. Sri Ganesh Lubricants Versus Commercial Tax Officer
Case Covered: M/s. Sri Ganesh Lubricants Versus Commercial Tax Officer Facts of the Case: This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned demand of the first respondent, dated 17.04.2017 calling upon the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.21,33,005/- towards dishonored cheques totally amounting
Orissa HC in the case of Devi Prasad Tripathy V/s. The Principal Commissioner of CGST
Case Covered: Devi Prasad Tripathy Versus The Principal Commissioner Order: 1. The Counter affidavit sworn to by the Principal Commissioner, GST and Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Commissionerate on behalf of Opposite Party Nos.1 to 7 is produced in Court today, which is taken on record. 2.
Madras HC in the case of Tvl.Vectra Computer Solutions Versus The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Case Covered: Tvl.Vectra Computer Solutions Versus The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Order of the Hon’ble Court: The petitioner has registered themselves on the file of the second respondent. The petitioner was filing returns under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and subsequently, under
Gujarat HC in the case of M/s. Remark Flour Mills
Case Covered: M/s. Remark Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Gujarat Oral Order: The petitioners are registered dealers under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and are engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of wheat flour, meslin flour, cereal flours, etc.
Delhi HC Order in the case of M/s Omaxe New Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd V/s. UOI.
Case Covered: M/s Omaxe New Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The limited issue which arises for consideration in the captioned writ petitions concerns the applicability of the instruction dated 21.12.2015 bearing F. No. 1080/09/DLA/MISC/15/757 [in short “2015 instruction”]
Delhi HC in the case of Ingenico International India Pvt. Ltd
Case Covered: Ingenico International India Pvt. Ltd Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Facts of the Case: The singular grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that despite the fact that the amount to be refunded as determined by the Revenue in October 2019,
The value of the goods/ material supplied or provided free of cost cannot be included in computation.
Case Covered: M/s. Raunaq International Ltd. Facts of the Case: M/s. Raunaq International Ltd, C/o M/s. Utility Energy Tech. & Engineers (P.) Ltd. Parichha Thermal Power, Jhansi were engaged in providing taxable services of “Erection, Commissioning & Installation Service” to their clients and were registered



