GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
CESTAT in the case of Interglobe Aviation LTD. Versus Commissioner of Customs
Case Covered: Interglobe Aviation LTD. Versus Commissioner of Customs Facts of the Case: All these 415 appeals have been filed by M/s Interglobe Aviation Limited. The issue raised in all these appeals is about the availability of Integrated Goods and Service Tax exemption provided at
Gujarat HC in the case of M/s Formative Tex Fab Versus State of Gujarat
Case Covered: M/s Formative Tex Fab Versus State of Gujarat Facts of the Case: By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a partnership firm through one of its partners, has prayed for the following reliefs: “a) to
Gujarat HC in the case of M/s. AAP And Co. Versus Union of India
Case Covered: M/s. AAP And Co. Versus Union of India Oral Order: We have heard Mr. Avinash Poddar, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant. Related Topic: Gujarat HC in the case of Messrs Vishnu Aroma Pouching Pvt Ltd Versus Union Of India Let Notice be issued to
Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Versus Kushal Ltd.
Case Covered: Union of India Versus Kushal Ltd. (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-12-2019 in SCA No. 19533/2019 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad Order: Heard learned counsel for the parties. On the question of interim relief, we
Gujarat HC in the case of Kushal Ltd. Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Kushal Ltd. Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the provisional attachment orders dated 18.10.2019 passed under section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. Facts of the Case: M/s. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd.( hereinafter referred to as “GNFC” or “lessor” or “Applicant”) has entered into a lease agreement dated 01.12.2015 with the President of India acting
Kerala HC in the case of M/s. Podaran Foods India Private Limited Versus State of Kerala
Case Covered: M/s. Podaran Foods India Private Limited Versus State of Kerala Facts of the Case: As these writ petitions raise a common challenge to the legality of orders of detention passed by the respondents under the GST Act, they are taken up together for
Uttarakhand HC in the case of The Dehradun Chartered Accountants Society Versus Union of India
Case Covered: The Dehradun Chartered Accountants Society Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The Dehradun Chartered Accountants Society, the petitioner, has filed this Public Interest Litigation (PIL) with the following prayer:- “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus,
Supreme Court in the case of M/s Vellanki Frame Works
Case Covered: M/s Vellanki Frame Works Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam Facts of the Case: These appeals by special leave are directed against the common judgment and order dated 18.12.2014 in Writ Petition Nos. 2552 of 2013 and 6258 of 2013 whereby, the High Court
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s Balkrishna Industries
Case Covered: M/s Balkrishna Industries Facts of the Case: The applicant submitted that they, M/s Balkrishna Industries, Mumbai, are one of the leading manufacturer and exporters of Tyres mainly used for special applications such as agricultural tractors and their various attachments, industrial and construction equipment,
Gujarat HC in the case of The All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants Versus Union of India
Case Covered: The All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The operative part of the order passed by this Court dated 8th January 2021 in the Special Civil Application No. 13653 of 2020 reads as under: “21 We are of the view that the respondent No.1 – Union of India, Ministry of Finance should immediately look into the issue, more particularly, the representation dated 12th October 2020 at Annexure: I of the paper book (page 108) and take an appropriate decision at the earliest in accordance with the law. We, accordingly, direct respondent
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s Vishv Enterprise
Case Covered: M/s Vishv Enterprise Facts of the Case: The applicant is engaged in the business of contract work services of Man Power Recruitment & Supply by outsourcing in the Government Department. There is a matter which needs clarification regarding the applicability of GST on