GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Kerala HC in the case of Alfa Group Versus The Assistant State Tax Officer
Case Covered: Alfa Group Versus The Assistant State Tax Officer Facts of the Case: The challenge in the Writ Petition is against Ext.P2 notice by which, goods belonging to the petitioner were detained in a parcel godown, on the ground that the value quoted in
Madras HC in the case of M/s.Shree M.Revathi Printers
Case Covered: M/s.Shree M.Revathi Printers Versus The Deputy Commissioner Ministry of Finance Facts of the Case: This matter is taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing mode. This writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings of the first respondent dated 28.02.2020, attaching the bank account
Delhi HC in the case of Rishi Bansal Propertor of Bansal Sales Corporation
Case Covered: Rishi Bansal Propertor of Bansal Sales Corporation Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. The
Madhya Pradesh AAR in the case of M/s Jabalpur Hotels Private Limited
Case Covered: M/s Jabalpur Hotels Private Limited Facts of the Case: The company Jabalpur Hotels Private Limited was incorporated on 13th March 2018. With 5000000 Share Holders holding 4970000 shares of Rs. 10/- each. The company was established with an objective to construct Hotel in Jabalpur
Karnataka AAAR in the case of M/s WeWork India Management Private Limited
Case Covered: M/s WeWork India Management Private Limited Facts of the Case: The Appellant is a private limited company engaged in providing shared workspace/ Office Space to the freelancers, start-ups, small businesses, and large enterprises. The Appellant provides a “space-as-a-service” membership model wherein it offers
No Right to Find a Deficiency in RFD01 after 15 days- Delhi High Court in Jian International
No right to find a deficiency in RFD01 after 15 days – No right to find a deficiency in RFD01 after 15 days of filing it. Held by the Honorable Delhi High court in case of Jian International. Case Covered- Jian International Versus Commissioner of
GST LitigationGST Council Will Correct the Inverted Duty Structure – Latest News from 45th Meeting of the GST Council
September 17, 2021: GST Council Will Correct the Inverted Duty Structure – Latest News from 45th Meeting of the GST Council GST Council in 45th Meeting held in Lucknow on 17th September 2021 the GST council has agreed to correct the inverted duty structure on
CA Shafaly GirdharwalMaharashtra AAR in the case of DRS Marine Services Private Limited
Case Covered: DRS Marine Services Private Limited Facts of the Case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and the MGST
Goa AAR in the case of Springfields (India) Distilleries
Case Covered: Springfields (India) Distilleries facts of the case: Springfields (India) Distilleries, have their registered office at H. No. 2, Raicho Ambo, Raia Salcete, and hold GSTIN 30AAOFS2556B1ZI. The applicant is a registered partnership firm manufacturing Hand Sanitizers vide License No. 999, issued by Directorate
Madras HC in the case of M/s.P.R.Mani Electronics Versus Union of India
Case Covered: M/s.P.R.Mani Electronics Versus Union of India Facts of the case: The validity of Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 (the CGST Rules) is under challenge in this writ petition on the grounds that it is ultra vires Section
Andhra Pradesh AAR in the case of M/s. Consulting Engineers Group Limited
Case Covered: M/s. Consulting Engineers Group Limited Facts of the case: M/s. Consulting Engineers Group Limited., (hereinafter referred to as ‘CEG’ or the ‘Applicant’) is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered with Registrar of Companies as “Consulting Engineering Group Limited, vide
VIJ Engineers And Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India
210 CWP-8885-2020 VIJ ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Present : Mr. Amrinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tajender Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. The affidavit filed by the petitioner is taken on record. Registry to tag the same