GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Madras HC in the case of K.Devamani Versus Union of India
Case Covered: K.Devamani Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the G.O.Ms.No.24 dated 27.05.2020 issued by the second respondent invoking Section 31
Supreme Court Directions on Hearings
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Standard Operating Procedure for hearing of matters through physical appearance before Hon’ble Court In continuation of directions already notified regarding the functioning of the Supreme Court of India, in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, more particularly through Circulars
Supreme Court In the case of Raj Pal Singh Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax
Case Covered: Raj Pal Singh Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax Facts of the Case: In the present case, the question concerning date of accrual of capital gains arose in the backdrop that though the proceedings for acquisition in question were taken up by way of notification
Gujarat HC in the case of Nipun Praveen Singhvi Versus State of Gujarat
Case Covered: Nipun Praveen Singhvi Versus State of Gujarat Facts of the Case: By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner had prayed for the following reliefs as originally framed: “(a) Your Lordships may be pleased to pass
Madhya Pradesh HC in the case of Smt. Kanishka Matta
Case Covered: Smt. Kanishka Matta Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent No.4 – Assistant Director, DGGSTI, Indore and respondent No.5 –
Maharashtra AAR in the case of M/s. Prasa Infocom & Power Solutions Private Limited
Case Covered: M/s. Prasa Infocom & Power Solutions Private Limited Facts of the Case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act
Gujarat HC in the case of Punjab National Bank
Case Covered: Punjab National Bank Versus M/s Mithilanchal Industries Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the Case: The present litigation initiated by the appellant Bank, right from the inception has resulted only in the loss of the time of the various judicial forums that have been approached
Orissa HC in the case of Prasanna Kumar Bisoi Versus Union of India
W.P.(C) NO.13190 OF 2020 Case Covered: Prasanna Kumar Bisoi Versus Union of India Order: 21.08.2020 BP Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.T.K.Satpathy, learned counsel for Central Excise. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that he is registered under
Gujarat HC in the case of M/s. Formative Tex-Fab Versus State of Gujarat
Case Covered: M/s. Formative Tex-Fab Versus State of Gujarat Facts of the Case: The facts giving rise to this writ application may be summarized as under: The writ applicant is registered under the GST. He is engaged in the business of manufacturing of different types
Delhi HC in the case of Dhruv Krishan Maggu Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Dhruv Krishan Maggu Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. The present writ petition
Madras HC in the case of Revenue Bar Association Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Revenue Bar Association Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of Writ of Declaration to declare the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (Appointment and Conditions of
Kerala HC in the Case of Pee Bee Enterprises Versus Assistant Commissioner
Case Covered: Pee Bee Enterprises Versus Assistant Commissioner Facts of the Case: The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders and Exts.P8 and P9 consequential demand notices issued him under the GST Act. In the writ petition, it is the