GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
CESTAT in the case of Shiv Om Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of C. EX.
Introduction In The Era of GST, there is a clause mentioned in the Act that “WRONG AVAIMENT Or UTILIZATION “of ITC will attract penal provision(Section 73 r/w Section 122). The same provisions were there in Central Excise Act. However, I have argued the case before
Whether service tax is levied on services received indirectly from intermediary foreign banks on furnishing guarantee to its foreign customer
Whether service tax is levied on services received indirectly from intermediary foreign banks on furnishing guarantee to its foreign customer PETITIONER: BGR Energy Systems Limited, Chennai. RESPONDENT: Additional Commissioner of GST & Central Excise. Read the full text of the case here. FACTS: Petitioner has
Madras HC in the case of BGR Energy Systems Limited
Citations: Union of India v. NITDIP Textile Processors Pvt.Ltd. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhopal, v. Minwool Rock Fibres Ltd. Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. v. Union of India Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-I v. Avenue Impex Sundaram clayton Ltd. v. Superintendent of Central Excise, Madras Mechanical Packing
GST LitigationDoctrine of Estoppel on retrospective change in the exemption notification
The doctrine of estoppel: The Word ‘Promissory Estoppel” means that a party is prevented by his own acts from claiming a right to detriment of the other party who was entitled to rely on such conduct and has acted accordingly. In simple words, when you
CA Shafaly GirdharwalBest career opportunities for CA quitters
career opportunities for CA quitters CA being a tough course wastes a lot of years of many students. After some years of failed attempts, it is a big question, How to proceed in life. Whether they should carry on with the course. They also try
Best course for CAs and advocates
Best course for CAs and advocates We are organizing another course to handhold you as a professional. It is starting from tomorrow. Supreme court counsel Mr. Vinay Shraff ji will be taking the sessions. We have tried to explore the fields with no professional course
Counsel was wearing vests while in video conferencing, What high court said?
Case Covered: Lalaram S/o Shyojiram, By Caste Gurjar Versus State Of Rajasthan Facts of the case: Learned counsel for the petitioner was contacted through video conferencing he was found to be wearing Baniyan. This court has already observed that during this pandemic where court functioning
Bhargava Motors Vs Union of India
Bhargava Motors Vs Union of India PETITIONER: BHARGAVA MOTORS RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Issue: Whether TRAN 1 credit is allowed to be claimed by a registered person after the due date because of technical glitches FACTS: Petitioner has accumulated excise credit as on
Abbott Healthcare Private … vs The Commissioner Of State Tax
Abbott Healthcare Private … vs The Commissioner Of State Tax … on 7 January 2020 Petitioner: ABBOTT HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED The petitioner is engaged in the sale of pharmaceutical products, diagnostic kits, etc. It places its diagnostic instruments at the premises of unrelated hospitals, laboratories,
Detention of truck for wrong vehicle number on E-way bill
Case 3: AMM Aquapure Systems v. Asstt. STO Petitioner: S.Anil Kumar (Trivandrum) & Rahul A. Respondent: Thushaara James; GP FACTS: The goods and conveyance carrying goods were detained on the ground that the E-way bill is showing the incorrect vehicle number. The petitioner claims that
Bharat Raj Punj Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax (Rajasthan High Court)
Bharat Raj Punj Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax (Rajasthan High Court) PETITIONER 1: Bharat Raj Punj PETITIONER 2: M/s Leel Electricals Limited RESPONDENT: COMMISSIONER OF CGST (Rajasthan) FACTS: The writ has been filed with a pray to quash and set aside summons
Delhi HC in the case of Bhargava Motors Versus Union of India
Citations: Tara Exports v. Union of India Section 140 (3) of the CGST Act, 2017 Rule 120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1280/2018 BHARGAVA MOTORS ….. Petitioner Through: Mr.Vineet Bhatia, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ….. Respondents Through: