Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
GST LitigationDelhi HC in the case of Reliance Electric Works Versus UOI
Citations: Section 140 of the CGST Act Rule 117 of the CGST Rules A.B. Pal Electricals v Union of India SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. vs. KS Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Willowood Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India ALD Automotive Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commercial
ROC FilingsWhy conversion of Public Limited Company should not be considered as Back Step
Why conversion of Public Limited Company should not be considered as Back Step Preface There are always certain reasons while opting for the registration of the Company as a Public Limited Company which might be either with a view to accepting deposit from public or
PCS Vinit NagarMay 6, 2020
GST LitigationDelhi HC in the case of Bharti Airtel Limited Versus UOI
Citations: Article 226 of the Constitution of India Rule 61 (5) of the GST Rules Section 37 of the CGST Act Section 38 of the CGST Act Section 39 of CGST Act Section 77 of the Act Section 168 of the CGST Act Section 54
GST LitigationBharti Airtel Ltd Vs. UOI :Taxpayer can rectify GSTR 3b
Case Covered: Bharti Airtel Ltd Vs. UOI : Case of Bharti Airtel Ltd Vs. UOI , argued by Advocate Tarun Gulati in Delhi high court. In this case, taxpayers are allowed to rectify GSTR 3b in the month to which it pertains. para 4 of
GST Compliance5 New Notifications in GST: Annual return date, E-way bill validity and more
5 New Notifications in GST 5 New Notifications in GST yesterday. These notifications are issued via the Gazette of India. They are not yet at the CBIC website. But they are quite important. Let us have a look at their summary. Filing of the return
The frustration of the contract under section 56 as the agreement has become impossible to perform should be appropriately invoked.
Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act deals with the frustration of a contract and states that any act which was to be performed after the contract became unlawful or impossible to perform and which the promisor cannot prevent will become void. The Supreme Court
CA Nirmal GhorawatMay 6, 2020Delhi Govt to levy 70% tax on MRP of liquor
70% tax on MRP of liquor Large ques in front of liquor shops. Delhi government tried to fetch some revenue from the customers. 70% tax will be levied on liquor. This will also help in reducing the crowd and maintain social distancing. In the capital
Income Tax ConsultancyJoin our free webinar on 8th May (5 PM onwards) on CIT(Appeals) Procedure under Income Tax including Drafting and Filing Area by CA Rohit Kapoor
About the Course: In this session, Rohit Kapoor Ji will discuss the following points: Understanding the Basis of Appeal before CIT Compilation of Appeal Documents (Ground, Facts, Condonation, Stay of Demand, etc.) The procedure of CIT(A) Important Points to Be Kept in Mind at the
GST LitigationAP AAR in the case of M/s Sri Chakra Milk Products LLP
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING ANDHRA PRADESH GOODS AND SERVICES TAX D No. 5-56, Block-B, R, K. Spring Valley Apartments, Edupugallu, Vijayawada-52 1 15 1 Present: D. Ramesh, Additional Commissioner of State Taxes…Member (State Tax) S. Narasimha Reddy, Additional Commissioner of Central Tax…Member (Central tax) AAR
GST LitigationFlavoured Milk is classified as Beverage and hence chargeable to GST @ 12%
Case Covered: M/s Sri Chakra Milk Products LLP Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017,
GST Litigation(Read Order) Tran 1 is barred by limitation Act ,Reliance Elektrik Works Vs. UOI
Quick Synopsis of Reliance Elektrik Works Vs. UOI Delhi high court in a historical decision allowed Tran 1 form till June 30. In the case of Reliance Elektrik Works Vs. UOI, This decision was made. The court observed that the period provided by the CGST
GST LitigationServiced apartments are also eligible for exemption under 12/2017
The applicant is a Limited Liability Partnership concern not registered under the provisions of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The applicant states that engaged in the business of developing, running, maintaining, operating, setting up, owning, dealing in, selling, renting, subletting, and managing to