Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
Provision including Trade Discounts / Incentives in Sale and Determination of Taxable Turnover is Ultra Vires: Jharkhand HC
Case Covered: Tata Motors Ltd. Versus The State of Jharkhand Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: In the present writ application, the challenge is to the vires of Section 9 (5) of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005,
COVID-19: Calcutta HC prevents Income Tax Authority from Distribution of Seized Jewellery
Case Covered: Ashok R. Mansata Versus Union of India Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: The prophetic words of Barack Obama, former President of the United States looms large upon us today. This present situation has arisen due to
Jharkhand High Court in the case of Tata Motors Ltd.
Citations: Section 4 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Sale of Goods Act, 1930 Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India State of Madras Vs. Gannon Dunkerley & Co., (Madras) Ltd. State of Rajasthan and Anr. Vs. Rajasthan Chemists Association Bharat Sanchar Nigam
Gujarat High Court in the case of Suo Motu Versus State of Gujarat
Citations: Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 42 of 2020 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2020 In R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 42 of 2020 With R/WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.
Chhattisgarh High Court in the case of K.P. Sugandh Ltd.
Citations: Section 68 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act of 2017 Section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act of 2017 Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act of 2017 Rules 138 & 139 of the Central
Calcutta HC in the case of Ashok R. Mansata Vs. Union of India
W.P. 5163 (W) of 2020 Ashok R. Mansata Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Ashok R. Mansata … for the Petitioner(in person). “When we think of the major threats to our national security, the first to come to mind are nuclear proliferation, rogue states
Undervaluation of goods in invoice can not be ground for detention – Chhattisgarh High Court
Case Covered: K.P. Sugandh Ltd. Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: Since the facts and grounds raised in both these writ petitions and the dates also being identical and the impugned orders also being same,
Pil to defer RERA court hearings
Case Covered: SUO MOTU Versus STATE OF GUJARAT Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: We have heard learned counsels Shri Vishwas Shah, Masoom Shah, and Shri B.V.Shah appearing for the petitioners in Writ Petition (PIL) No.46 of 2020; learned counsel
Vivad se Vishwas scheme 2020
Vivad se Vishwas scheme 2020 While filing Form 1 (Form for filing Declaration and Undertaking) need to note the following points:- 1. In part A Option exercised by Appellant: Mention “Yes” if going to pay tax 2. In Part B If yes,whether order passed by
THE FOREIGN TRADE (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT, 1992
THE FOREIGN TRADE (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT, 1992: ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II POWER OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TO MAKE ORDER AND ANNOUNCE FOREIGN TRADE POLICY 3. Powers to make provisions relating to imports
SC stays HC verdict for not levying taxes due to Corona
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [S.C.R., Order XXI Rule 3(1)(a)] CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2020 UNDER ARTICLE 136 OF CONSTITUTION OFINDIA (Arising from the impugned interim order dated 19.03.2020 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Kerala,
All central Acts to apply in J&K also: HM order
ORDER S.O. 1123(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 96 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019 (34 of 2019), and of all other powers enabling it in that behalf, the Central Government hereby makes the following Order in respect of the Union