Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
Amendment in 89(4) (c) is not retrospective ( Pdf Attach)
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/S. INDIAN HERBAL STORE PVT. LTD Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Citations: 1. Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers, Govt. of India v. Cipla Ltd., 2. M/s Tonbo Imaging India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Corporate Tax in UAE 2023 — A Complete Guide
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) had the distinctive advantage of being a low- or no-tax jurisdiction for a long time. The citizens did not pay any tax on their incomes, and very few businesses paid taxes on their profits. But the government has recently introduced
What is a “murder” and “culpable homicide not amounting the murder”- Case no. 7 of 101 historical judgments of India.
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: KM Nanavati Vs State of Maharastra Background- It is a matter of 1959. Just after we got the independence. This case got media coverage and even movies were made on it. A navy officer was posted
HC remanded the refund case back to authorities and instructed the appellant to provide details
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Schlumberger Asia Services Limited Vs Union of India Facts of the cases: The petitioner is impugning 11 identical orders all dated 25th August 2021, by which the petitioner’s appeals were rejected. Petitioner is a company incorporated
ICAI seek fees disclosure from members(Pdf Attach)
In a recent development the ICAI has asked the members to make the disclosures related to fees. As per the requirement of code of ethics of ICAI, the members are required to make some disclosures related to their highest paid clients. In accordance with the
Govt will challange the judgement asking ED to give grounds of arrest
SC judgment direction to ED to inform the grounds of arrest in Pankaj Bansal case will be challenged by Govt in review petition Recently we have posted the judgment of Pankaj Bansal Vs Union of India. In this case the court emphasised on the importance
GST Council meeting scheduled for October 7 may entail a review of advancements in anti-profiteering cases.
The upcoming meeting of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council is set to include a review of the developments in anti-profiteering matters. During this meeting, the Council will receive an update on the performance report of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) for the
[Just in] Big decision for GST on Corporate guarantee
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Background- The issue of tax on corporate guarantee in GST is settled now. The personal guarantee given by the director is taxable now. Although many corporates were getting the notices earlier also. There was a lack of clear
Service Tax on the Retention of Freight Amount
The central issue in this case revolved around the applicability of service tax on the retention of freight amounts, specifically the profits retained by the taxpayer in freight trading. The tax department contended that this activity fell under the purview of service tax, classified as
[Just in] Big decision on GST tribunal
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com The GST Council held its 52nd meeting today. As we all know formation of a GST tribunal was pending for a long. In recent times the government has issued a notification for the formation of a Tribunal. But
Filing of Time Barred Appeals
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com A lot of you may be suffering due to this issue in GST. Many taxpayers failed to file their appeal because they didn’t find the notice or order on time. A big amount of demand was due for
Live updates from 52nd GST council meeting press release attached
All updates related to the GST Council’s 52nd Meeting will be updated here – No GST rate cut on EV batteries as the fitment committee rejected the proposal. – Delhi minister Atishi Singh favoured the Online gaming companies and opposed the notices sent to them



