Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
FIR & BailSC judgement on grounds of appeal in Pankaj Bansal is not applicable on UAPA
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: AMIT CHAKRABORTY VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Citations: 1. Pankaj Bansal Vs. Union of India & Ors 2. K.M. Abdulla Kunhi and B.L. Abdul Khader vs. Union of India and Others, 3. V. Senthil Balaji vs.
CA Shafaly Girdharwal
GST Litigation101 historical judgments of SC- Does the freedom of speech includes the right to criticise the government
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Kedarnath Singh Vs State of Bihar The important case related to the sedition law in India. We have freedom of speech as a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. Background- As per section
CA Shafaly Girdharwal
GST LitigationStop wasting the time of SC by these kind of PIL’s
The Supreme Court, in a recent ruling, rejected a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the validity of Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution and Albert Einstein’s renowned mass–energy equivalence equation (E=MC²). This PIL, filed by Raj Kumar, was brought before a bench presided over by
Rule 89(4C) is ultra vires and thus strike down (Pdf Attach)
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/S TONBO IMAGING INDIA PVT LTD, Vs UNION OF INDIA Citations: (i) CIT vs. Taj Mahal Hotel – (1971) 3 SCC 550; (ii) Bimal Chandra Banerjee vs. State of Madhya Pradesh – 1970) 2 SCC 467;
CA Shafaly Girdharwal
GST LitigationA Delhi court has ordered Prabir Purkayastha and Amit Chakraborty to be placed in judicial custody for a duration of 10 days.
In a recent development, a Delhi Court has ordered the detention of Prabir Purkayastha, the founder of NewsClick, and the company’s Human Resources (HR) head, Amit Chakraborty, for a period of ten days under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). The Delhi Police had registered
GST ComplianceCBIC has released a significant clarification in response to specific media reports concerning the GST applicability to Gangajal.
Gangajal finds widespread use in household rituals throughout the nation, and it’s important to note that puja samagri enjoys an exemption from Goods and Services Tax (GST). The deliberation on the GST applicability to puja samagri was thoroughly examined during the 14th and 15th meetings
FIR & BailWill the provisions of IPC overrides the Customs Act?
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Adani Power Limited, Vs Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Citations: 1. A.R. Antulay Vs. Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak 2. Gangula Ashok Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh 3. Jeewan Kumar Raut Vs. CBI 4. Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Deepak
CA Shafaly Girdharwal
Amendment in 89(4) (c) is not retrospective ( Pdf Attach)
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/S. INDIAN HERBAL STORE PVT. LTD Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Citations: 1. Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers, Govt. of India v. Cipla Ltd., 2. M/s Tonbo Imaging India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
CA Shafaly Girdharwal
GST LitigationCheetos and kurkure will fall in catagory of “Namkeen” (Pdf Attach)
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Ms Pepsico India Holdings Private Ltd VS Assistant Commissioner Anti Evasion, Citations: 1. Parle Agro (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, 2. Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. 3. Muller and
CA Shafaly Girdharwal
ROC LitigationHigh court can’t decide a case when the advocate of accused was not present.
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Chandra Pratap Singh, Vs State of M.P Facts of the cases: In a recent judgment the honorable Supreme court rejected a decision by High court without the presence of advocate of accused. Observation & Judgement of
CA Shafaly Girdharwal
GST LitigationSupreme Court’s Decision to Review Rajasthan’s Case: CM Relief Fund’s Exclusion Despite PM CARES Fund’s CSR Benefits
Recently, the Supreme Court of India drives its attention to the case requires an examination in an original lawsuit filed under Article 131 of the Constitution. This lawsuit was initiated by the State of Rajasthan, alleging discrimination in the treatment of the Chief Minister’s Relief
GST LitigationThe Kerala High Court has altered the dress code for female judicial officers, now allowing them to wear salwar kameez, shirts, and trousers..( Attachment)
The Kerala High Court has recently updated its dress code guidelines for female judicial officers within the state. In contrast to the previous requirement, which mandated the wearing of a saree and blouse, judicial officers now have the flexibility to choose between wearing a salwar