Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
Validity of recovery without show cause notice
Can the department recover the tax on any pretext without the issue of the show cause notice? Is a taxpayer compulsorily liable to make the payment on receipt of the Statement in Form GST DRC-01A? Is a taxpayer obliged in law to honor the demand
“Supplier sins & Recipient repents…!
Part-I Background “It is no doubt fair and in the national interest to check tax evasion with a firm hand, but it is neither fair nor in the national interest that the law should be made to bear hard on a large number of honest
297th Issue of “Tax Connect”
Tax Calendar Due date Extended Due date Form/Return/Challan Reporting Period Description 10th May 2021 31st May 2021 GSTR-8 April 2021 Due Date for TCS Return who are E-Commerce Agencies 10th May 2021 31st May 2021 GSTR-7 April 2021 Due Date for filing GST-TDS Return
Relaxation of cash payments of more than 2 lakhs in hospital: CBDT
MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 7th May 2021 (INCOME-TAX) S.O. 1803(E).—The Central Government, in the exercise of powers conferred by clause (iii) of Proviso to Section 269ST of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereby specifies
Court distributed the seized concentrators to police and judges
FIR No. 917/21 PS: Dwarka South U/s:- 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, 3 Epidemic Act & 420/269/188/120 B/ 34 IPC State Vs Vinay Agarwal & Akash Vashist The urgent hearing of the application was conducted from my residence through Video conferencing Via the CISCO WEBEX meeting,
Need for a Serious Midterm Correction in GST.
Introduction: Punjab FM writes to Union FM Nirmala Sitharaman regarding the need for serious midterm correction in GST. Raises issue of rules surpassing limits of act & need of amnesty scheme Subject: GST: Need for a Serious Midterm Correction. Dear Nirmala Sitharaman Jee “Jai Hind”
Madras HC Order in the case of Ramakrishnan Mahalingam Versus State Tax Officer (Circle)
Case Covered: Ramakrishnan Mahalingam Versus State Tax Officer (Circle) Facts of the Case: The challenge in this writ petition is to a deficiency memo dated 05.10.2020 issued by the 2nd respondent, the first appellate authority under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
SC Order in the case of The Chief Election Commissioner of India Versus M.R Vijayabhaskar
Case Covered: The Chief Election Commissioner of India Versus M.R Vijayabhaskar Facts of the Case: A delicate question of balancing the powers of two constitutional authorities in this appeal has raised larger issues of the freedom of speech and expression of the media, the right
Instruction No. 09/2021-Customs
Instruction No. 09/2021-Customs F. No. CBIC-190354/2/2021-TO (TRU-I)-CBEC Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (Tax Research Unit) Room No. 146-J, North Block New Delhi, dated 3rd May 2021 To All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive), All Principal
Delhi HC Order in the case of Anil Kumar Goel Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Anil Kumar Goel Versus Union of India Order: Allowed, subject to the applicants/petitioners curing the deficiencies referred to in the captioned applications within five days of the resumption of the normal functioning of this Court. 2. This writ petition raises a pertinent question,
Orissa HC Order in the case of M/s. Shree Gobind Alloys Pvt. Ltd. V/s. UOI
Case Covered: M/s.Shree Gobind Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Order of the Hon’ble Court: 1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. 2. Issue notice. 3. Mr. P.K. Parhi, learned Assistant Solicitor General accepts notice on behalf of Opposite Party No.1.
Madras HC Order in the case of Mrs.Saraspathy Sundaraj Versus The Assistant Commissioner
Case Covered: Mrs.Saraspathy Sundaraj Versus The Assistant Commissioner Facts of the Case: The petitioner is aggrieved against the attachment created in her property situated in Survey No.156/1 and 156/2, T.S.No.6056, Block No.135, Theyagaraya Nagar Division, measuring 5623 sq. ft, New Door No.11, Old Door No.29,



