M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 |
Table of Contents
Lalaram S/o Shyojiram, By Caste Gurjar
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
Learned counsel for the petitioner was contacted through video conferencing he was found to be wearing Baniyan. This court has already observed that during this pandemic where court functioning is being done through video conferencing, lawyers must appear in proper uniform. Even through video conferencing a decorum of the court is required to be maintained. The Advocates Act provides for lawyers to wear a uniform while pleading the case for their clients.
Keeping in view that the petitioner’s counsel was not in proper uniform, this matter is adjourned.
List this case again on 5th May 2020.
Consultant
Faridabad, India
As a Consultease Administrator, I'm responsible for the smooth administration of our portal. Reach out to me in case you need help.
Recieve the most important tips and updates
Absolutely Free! Unsubscribe anytime.
We adhere 100% to the no-spam policy.