Refund rejected without proper reasons was set aside (Pdf Attach)
Table of Contents
Cases Covered:
CHEGG INDIA PVT LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
Facts of the case
The petitioner is, inter alia, engaged in the business of software development, content development, marketing and other IT and IT enabled services in the field of education technology. The petitioner W.P.(C) 14886/2022 Page 2 of 4 claims that it exports education services to recipients in seventy countries without payment of GST. The said services are Zero Rated Supplies in terms of Section 16 of the Integrated Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter ‘IGST Act’). The petitioner is thus entitled to refund of Input Tax Credit (hereafter ‘ITC’) relating to input services
Observations & Judgement of the court
The authorities rejected the refund on the wrong grounds. They did not specify the details for rejections and just mentioned the sections. Even the proper hearing was not done by the authorities.
Thus the order was set aside and case was remanded back to the authorities.
Read & Download the Full M/s Aastha Enterprises VS State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial State Taxes
[pdf_attachment file=”1″ name=”optional file name”]
CA
