FIR No. 917/21 PS: Dwarka South U/s:- 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, 3 Epidemic Act & 420/269/188/120 B/ 34 IPC State Vs Vinay Agarwal & Akash Vashist The urgent hearing of the application was conducted from my residence through Video conferencing Via the CISCO WEBEX meeting,
Case Covered: The Chief Election Commissioner of India Versus M.R Vijayabhaskar Facts of the Case: A delicate question of balancing the powers of two constitutional authorities in this appeal has raised larger issues of the freedom of speech and expression of the media, the right
Instruction No. 09/2021-Customs F. No. CBIC-190354/2/2021-TO (TRU-I)-CBEC Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (Tax Research Unit) Room No. 146-J, North Block New Delhi, dated 3rd May 2021 To All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive), All Principal
Introduction: Punjab FM writes to Union FM Nirmala Sitharaman regarding the need for serious midterm correction in GST. Raises issue of rules surpassing limits of act & need of amnesty scheme Subject: GST: Need for a Serious Midterm Correction. Dear Nirmala Sitharaman Jee “Jai Hind”
Case Covered: Forum for People’s Collective Efforts (FPCE) Versus The State of West Bengal Facts of the Case: The constitutional validity of the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (“WB-HIRA”/the “State enactment”) is challenged in a petition under Article 32. The basis of the
Case Covered: Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil Versus The Chief Minister Facts of the Case: This Constitution Bench has been constituted to consider questions of seminal importance relating to contours and extent of special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward class (SEBC) of
Case Covered: M/s.Shree Gobind Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Order of the Hon’ble Court: 1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. 2. Issue notice. 3. Mr. P.K. Parhi, learned Assistant Solicitor General accepts notice on behalf of Opposite Party No.1.
Case Covered: Mrs.Saraspathy Sundaraj Versus The Assistant Commissioner Facts of the Case: The petitioner is aggrieved against the attachment created in her property situated in Survey No.156/1 and 156/2, T.S.No.6056, Block No.135, Theyagaraya Nagar Division, measuring 5623 sq. ft, New Door No.11, Old Door No.29,
Case Covered: M/s.Chaizup Beverages LLP Versus The Assistant Commissioner Facts of the Case: These Writ Petitions challenge appellate orders dated 12.05.2020 passed by R2 confirming the rejection of the refunds claimed by the petitioner. The rejection is confirmed taking note of paragraph 2.5 of Board’s
Finally, CBIC also comes up with certain reliefs relating to statutory and regulatory compliance matters under various provisions of GST Law due to the Lockdown situation at multiple locations of the Country. A brief analysis of the Notifications 08/2021 to 14/2021 dated 01.05.2021 are summarized
