Case Covered: M/s. Bank of India Versus The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Facts of the Case: This appeal in ITA No.3473/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2015-16 preferred by the order against the revision order of the ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Mumbai u/s.263 of the
Supreme Court Ends ‘Extension Of Limitation’ SUO MOTO WRIT (CIVIL) NO. 3 OF 2020 IN RE: COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION It is needless to point out that the law of limitation finds its root in two Latin maxims, one of which is ‘Vigilantibus Non-Dormientibus
To, All the DGsIT(Inv.)/CCsIT (Central)/ DGIT (I&CI) Subject: Action required to be taken in cases where income escaping assessment pertains to A.Y.s 2013-14 to 2017-18-reg. Ref: Instruction issued vide F. No. 414/132/2018-IT(Inv. I) (part I) dated 05.03.2021. Respected Madam/Sir, Kind reference is invited to the
Case Covered: BA Continuum India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: In this petition filed under Articles 226 / 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed legality and correctness of five identical orders all dated 26.06.2020 passed by
Case Covered: M/s Deepak Print Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) To admit and allow this petition; (B) To issue any
[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)] Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 05/2021 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 8th March 2021 G.S.R…..(E).– In
In Re: Cognizance For Extension of Limitation. Order: Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this Court took suo moto cognizance of the situation arising from difficulties that might be faced by the litigants across the country in filing petitions/applications/suits/appeals/all other proceedings within the
Property of Wife cannot be encumbered for the Excise Duty Liability of Husband unless the same is inherited from Husband 2021 (3) TMI 168 – CESTAT Ahmedabad in Mrs. Meena Krishna Agarwal Vs C.C.E & S.T, Vadodara Facts of Case 1. Government dues which were
Case Covered: Awadh Bar Association Versus Union of India Order: At the threshold, it is stated by the learned Additional Solicitor General of India that respondent nos. 1 and 2 have taken a decision to file a Special Leave Petition to assail the correctness of
Whether Service Tax Payable On Constructed Area Falling To The Share of Land-Owner Under Joint Development Agreement? It is very common in the Real Estate Industry, the land–owner does not the wherewithal for construction and development of (a) Group Housing Complex (b) Commercial Complex (c) Residential–cum– commercial
