Case Covered: Rateria Laminators Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner Grade 2 Citation: 1. Bharti Airtel Ltd. vs. State of U.P. 2. Assistant Commissioner (ST) vs. Satyam Shivam Papers Pvt. Ltd. 3. Gobind Tobacco Manufacturing Co. vs. State of U.P Facts of the case Petitioner in
Case Covered: Gobinda Construction vs Union of India Citation: 1. Vinoy Viswam vs. Union of India & Ors 2. Modern Dental College and Research Centre & Ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors 3. K.T. Moopil Nair vs. State of Kerala 4. Adfert Technologies
In compliance with the authority vested under subsection 4 of section 109 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), and as a replacement for Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue’s earlier notification S.O.3009(E) dated August 21, 2019, published in the
Cases Covered STATE TAX OFFICER (IB) & ORS. VERSUS SHABU GEORGE & ANR. Facts of the cases : The writ is filed for the release of the cash that was seized from his premises in connection with an investigation done by the authorities under the
Cases Covered M/s Sree Durga Distributors vs State of Karnataka Facts of the cases : According to the appellant, dog feed and cat feed are the products which would fall in the category of animal feed under Entry 5. According to the appellant, Entry
Cases Covered: REDAMANCY WORLD Versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL Facts of the cases : The petitioner became aware that its bank account was directed to be frozen by an communication dated 29.04.2019 (Letter No.DGGI/GZU/INV/Gr-E/REDAMANCY/191/2018-19) from a letter dated 24.05.2019, issued by Canara Bank, sent in response
Cases Covered: THE KESHAV MILLS COMPANY LTD. & ANR VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Facts of the Cases: This is one of the historical cases related to the principle of natural justice. Every person should be given an opportunity of being heard. In this
Cases Covered: M/s. M. L. Dalmiya & Co. Ltd. & Anr. Vs The Additional Commissioner CGST & CX Facts of the Cases: I’m pleased to announce that the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court, where the case was argued by Advocate Ankit Kanodia, has rendered a significant
Under the leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, the Union Cabinet has granted approval for the implementation of Phase III of the eCourts Project. This project, categorized as a Central Sector Scheme, is scheduled to run for a duration of four years, starting from
Cases Covered: ARVINDBHAI BALUBHAI VORA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT Citation: Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation Facts of the Cases: The petitioner engaged in the procurement of goods and duly claimed input tax credit. However, allegations surfaced regarding the legitimacy of the supplier’s registration,
