Cases Covered: M/S Khan Enterprises Vs Additional Commissioner And Another Citations: Anandeshwar Traders vs. State of U.P. Mohinder Singh Gill and another vs. The Chief Election Commissioner,New Delhi and others M/s Riya Traders vs. State of U.P. And another M/s Margo Brush India and others
The GST e-invoice system issued an Update on September 11, 2023, indicating that, as per the directives of the GST Authority, a 30-day time limit for reporting invoices from the date of their issuance is now mandatory for e-invoice portals. This requirement applies to taxpayers
Cases Covered: Wallem Shipmanagement (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Union of India & Ors Facts of the case A refund application was filed by the taxpayer. The respondent issued a SCN. The applicant requested for the extension of the hearing date as there was a PANDEMIC
Cases Covered: Karmaxx Infotech VS The Assistant Commissioner Citation: 1. Kaur & Singh v Collector of Central Excise, Facts of the case The principal place of business was changed by the taxpayer. But the information was not updated on the GST portal.The unregistered office of
Cases Covered: CHEGG INDIA PVT LIMITED VS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX Facts of the case The petitioner is, inter alia, engaged in the business of software development, content development, marketing and other IT and IT enabled services in the field of education
Cases Covered: M/s Aastha Enterprises VS State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial State Taxes Citation: Sri Vinayaga Agencies v. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) & Anr. M/s D.Y. Beathel Enterprises v. The State Tax Officer ALD. Automotive Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commercial Tax Officer
Case Covered: HIMANGSHU KUMAR RAY VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL Citation: 1. State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh 2. Bakaulla Mollah v. Debiruddin Mollah Facts of the case An order was passed on the taxpayer. Soon after the impugned order was passed by the
Case Covered: Sun Microsystems (I) PVT LTD., vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax , LTU Citation: 1.M/s Arcelor Mittal Stainless India Pvt. Ltd. V/s Commissioner Service Tax, Mumbai-II Facts of the case The appellant is a subsidiary. It markets the
Case Covered: Jupiter Exports v. Commissioner of GST Citation: 1. Amman Match Company v. Assistant Commissioner of GST & C. Ex. 2. BA Continuum India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Others 3. Service Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India 4. National Highways
Case Covered: J.K. Cement Ltd. Vs State Of U.P And 3 Others Facts of the case The petitioner being registered company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 is engaged in the manufacture and sale of cements, wall putty, adhesives etc. The petitioner is duly registered
