2021 (7) TMI 427 – Delhi High Court in One Mobikwik Systems Private Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Related Topic: A petitioner who seeks equity must do equity Facts A show-cause notice was served on the petitioner, on 11.06.2021, Petitioner was, however,
विषय:- जीएसटी कर कानूनों के पालन करने में आम करदाता को आने िाली परेशाननयों को हल करने हेतु ज्ञापन . आपके कुशल नेतत्ृि में जीएसटी भारत में अब चार िर्ष पूरे कर चुका है और अब यह तय है कक जीएसटी भारत िर्ष में
The MSME sector is the soul and blood of the Indian economy. It provides the raw material for the bigger industries, maximum employment, and also spearheads innovation, design, and technology in the fast-changing industry. Most of the Start UPs are in this sector only. It
Rule 36(4) restricts the availment of input tax credit beyond 5% of the ITC reflected in Form GSTR 2A/2B. However, as per Notification No. 13/2021-CT dated 1st May 2021 as amended by Notification No: 27/2021 dated 01/06/2021the said restriction will not apply in individual months
2021 (7) TMI 174 – Madras High Court in M/s. NCR Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner Of GST & Central Excise, Puducherry Commissionerate, Puducherry 1. The mixed question of fact and law has to be adjudicated with reference to the original records and
Subject: – Memorandum to solve the problems faced by the common taxpayer in complying with GST tax laws in India. Under your able leadership, GST has now completed four years in our country India and now it is certain that GST is going to
Advance Ruling Mislead The Industry And Shown Incorrect Path Knocking On The Doors Of Government & GST Council Is Required 1. Manufacturers of FRK in the entire industry were classifying the FRK under Chapter Heading 1006 taxable to GST @ 0% (unbranded Rice) & 5%
2021 (7) TMI 466 – Rajasthan High Court in M/S. Avon Udhyog, Versus State Of Rajasthan, Assistant Commissioner, State Tax (Gst), Ward – II, Circle Anti Evasion, Jodhpur., Deputy Commissioner, Circle – C, Jodhpur – Ward – 3, Rajasthan. Facts A search was conducted
Due to the disastrous second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, in order to reduce the compliance burden, the Income Tax Department, in accordance with the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TLA Act, 2020) has extended various due dates
Case Covered: Shri N.M. Thualseedharan, M/s. N.V. Chips Facts of the Case: The applicant requested for advance ruling on the following; 1. Whether jack fruit chips sold without BRAND NAME are classifiable as NAMKEENS and are covered by HSN code 2106.90.99 and taxable under Entry
