GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
GST LitigationBombay HC in the case of Dharmendra M. Jani Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Dharmendra M. Jani Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for a declaration that section 13(8)(b) and section 8(2) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax
GST LitigationTax/Penalty not Payable on account of Expiry of Way Bill in Transit if no evasion of Tax.
Cost of Rs. 10,000/- imposed on Department for abuse of Power 2021 (6) TMI 378 – Telangana High Court in M/s Satyam Shivam Papers Pvt. Ltd. Versus Asst. Commissioner St And 4 Others Facts The admitted facts are that the petitioner had dispatched goods on
GST LitigationGujarat HC in the case of Messers SB Traders Versus State of Gujarat
Case Covered: Messers SB Traders Versus State of Gujarat Facts of the Case: By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs: “This Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ,
GST LitigationDelhi HC Order in the case of R.R. Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Tax
Case Covered: R.R. Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner Of Central Tax, GST, Delhi North Facts of the Case: The present petition was heard on 21st December 2020 along with other batch matters relating to difficulties faced by taxpayers in filing form GST TRAN-1 (hereinafter “TRAN-1
GST LitigationMadhya Pradesh HC in the case of Palak Agarwal Vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes
Case Covered: Palak Agarwal Vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes Order of the Hon’ble Court: Heard through Video Conferencing. Shri Milind Sharma learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Lal learned counsel for the respondent. Heard. In this petition, the grievance raised by the petitioner
GST LitigationSupreme Court Order in the case of Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd.
Case Covered: Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. Versus CG Power And Industrial Solutions Limited Facts of the Case: This Special Leave Petition, under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, filed by the Petitioner, hereinafter referred to as the UPPTCL, is against a final
GST LitigationTelangana HC in the case of M/s Golden Mesh Industries Vs. Assistant Commissioner State Tax
Case Covered: M/s Golden Mesh Industries Vs. Assistant Commissioner State Tax Issue: Whether the best judgement order can be passed without stating by which method the principal amount arrived at the best of their knowledge? Whether penalty can be levied without mentioning under which section
GST LitigationDelhi HC in the case of Roshni Sana Jaiswal Vs. Commissioner of central taxes GST Delhi
Case Covered: Roshni Sana Jaiswal Vs. Commissioner of central taxes GST Delhi Issue: Whether bank account of a director of the company can be provisionally attached where proceeding u/s 67 of the act was initiated against the company and not against the director? Brief Facts
GST LitigationDelhi HC Order in the case of Gurcharan Singh Versus Ministry Of Finance
Case Covered: Gurcharan Singh Versus Ministry Of Finance Facts of the Case: This is a George Floyd moment for the citizens of this country. The refrain is “I can’t breathe”, albeit, in a somewhat different context and setting; although in circumstances, some would say, vastly
GST LitigationMadras High court in the case of Tvl. Mehar Tex
Case Covered: Tvl. Mehar Tex Versus The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise Issue: Whether refund of CGST and IGST can be denied on the ground that his petitioner’s claim got consolidated under one head of SGST due to technical error? Relevant Section /
GST LitigationGauhati HC Order in the case of M/s Vinayak Logistics V/s. UOI
Case Covered: M/s Vinayak Logistics Versus Union of India Order of the Hon’ble Court: Heard Mr. A Saraf, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. A Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B Sarma, learned standing counsel for the respondent Railways. This writ
GST LitigationValue of Free Supply of Material to the Supplier shall not form part of value for levy of Service Tax
2021 (2) TMI 49 – CESTAT New Delhi in M/S Tcl – MMPL Consortium Versus Commissioner Central Excise Commissionerate, Jodhpur Facts, Appellant Contention, and Department View 1. Appellant is engaged in providing mining services to M/s Hindustan Copper Limited, HCL 2. HCL shall provide