GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Rajasthan HC in the case of Risha Lodha Versus The ICAI
Case Covered: Risha Lodha Versus The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Facts of the Case: The petitioner, a young girl-student of 21 years of age, has knocked at the doors of this Court being aggrieved by extreme oppressive action of a professional body-The Institute
Supreme Court in the case of State of Madras V/s. S. G. Jayaraj Nadar & Sons
Case Covered: State of Madras Versus S. G. Jayaraj Nadar & Sons Headnote: The assessee was a dealer in motor vehicles and spare parts and certain other goods. During the assessment proceedings under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 it was found inter alia
CGST Commissioner Order in the case of M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
1. This copy is granted free of charge for the private use of the person (s) to whom it is sent. 2. Any person aggrieved with this Order may appeal against this Order to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, 14-3d Floor,
Supreme Court in the case of Shabina Abraham Versus Collector of Central Excise & Customs
Case Covered: Shabina Abraham Versus Collector of Central Excise & Customs Facts of the Case: “Nothing is certain except death and taxes.” Thus spake Benjamin Franklin in his letter of November 13, 1789, to Jean Baptiste Leroy. To tax the dead is a contradiction in
Madras HC Order in the case of Antony Alphonse Kevin Alphonse V/s. The Income Tax Officer
Case Covered: Antony Alphonse Kevin Alphonse Versus The Income Tax Officer Order: The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 15.03.2021 which has been digitally signed by the second respondent at about 16:22:33 hours on the said date. In other words, the impugned order has
Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Versus M/s Unicorn Industries
Case Covered: Union of India Versus M/s Unicorn Industries Facts of the Case: The question of law that arises for consideration in these appeals is, ‘as to whether, by invoking the doctrine of promissory estoppel, can the Union of India be estopped from withdrawing the
CESTAT Order in the case of Cadila Healthcare Limited Versus C.S.T.-Service Tax – Ahmedabad
Case Covered: Cadila Healthcare Limited Versus C.S.T.-Service Tax – Ahmedabad Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that the appellant M/s Cadila Health Care Ltd. is a public limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing pharmaceutical products as well as
Madras HC Order in the case of M/S DY Beathel Enterprises Vs. State Tax Officer
Case Covered: M/S DY Beathel Enterprises Versus State Tax Officer Issue: Whether the input tax credit availed by the purchaser can be questioned without taking any action against the seller? Brief Facts of the Case: • The petitioners herein are dealers, registered with Nagercoil Assessment
Telangana HC in the case of Vijay Metal Vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Case Covered: Vijay Metal Versus The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Issue: Whether it is mandatory that when a truck is carrying goods of TWO e-Way Bills then it has to unload the goods of shorter distance first and then the goods of longer distance or
Supreme Court Order In Re: Contagion of COVID-19 Virus In Prisons
Case Covered: Re: Contagion of COVID-19 Virus In Prisons Versus Order of the Hon’ble Court: 1. Application of impleadment is allowed. The applicant who was already permitted to intervene in the Suo Motu Writ Petition filed the above I.A.s seeking the following reliefs: i. Pass
Madras HC Order in the case of Ramakrishnan Mahalingam Versus State Tax Officer (Circle)
Case Covered: Ramakrishnan Mahalingam Versus State Tax Officer (Circle) Facts of the Case: The challenge in this writ petition is to a deficiency memo dated 05.10.2020 issued by the 2nd respondent, the first appellate authority under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Delhi HC Order in the case of Anil Kumar Goel Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Anil Kumar Goel Versus Union of India Order: Allowed, subject to the applicants/petitioners curing the deficiencies referred to in the captioned applications within five days of the resumption of the normal functioning of this Court. 2. This writ petition raises a pertinent question,



