GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Karnataka AAR in the case of M/s. Fraunhofer- Gessellschaft
Case Covered: M/s. Fraunhofer- Gessellschaft Zur Forderung der angewwandten Forschung Facts of the Case: The applicant, incorporated in Germany, undertakes the business of promoting applied research and hence established their liaison office in Bangalore, India, (hereinafter referred to as “Applicant” or “liaison office/ LO”), under
Karnataka AAR in the case of M/s. Ambara
Case Covered: M/s. Ambara Facts of the Case: The applicant is a partnership firm registered under the provisions of the Goods and Services Act, 2017. The applicant states that they are engaged in the business of providing health care services and also run a Hospital in
Karnataka AAR in the case of M/s. Vimos Technocrats Private Limited
Case Covered: M/s. Vimos Technocrats Private Limited Facts of the Case: The applicant is a private limited company rendering pure consultancy services like project management consultancy services including construction, supervision, quality control, rejuvenation, and development of lakes. Further, the applicant also involved in the preparation
AAR observing the tax rate of “Parota” 18% is void ab initio
Case Covered- Applicant- M/s ID fresh food (India) Pvt ltd. AAAR Karnataka The tax rate of “Parota” 18% is void ab initio You must have heard about this headline. Some months back it was the news of the town. The tax rate of Parota 18%
CA Shafaly GirdharwalKerala HC in the case of Abco Trades (P) Ltd. Versus The Assistant State Tax Officer
Case Covered: Abco Trades (P) Ltd. Versus The Assistant State Tax Officer Facts of the Case: The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by the Ext.P5(c) order of detention that was issued to it detaining a consignment of lubricant oil that was being transported at
Karnataka HC in the case of M/s. DPK Engineers Private Limited
Case Covered: M/s. DPK Engineers Private Limited Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The short grievance of the petitioner/ assessee is against the unilateral appropriation of a part of the refundable amount in terms of the impugned Form GST RFD-06 dated 13.06.2018 a copy
Bombay HC in the case of Shri. Girdhari Lal Lath Versus State of Maharashtra
Case Covered: Shri. Girdhari Lal Lath Versus State of Maharashtra Facts of the Case: By filing this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondents to unfreeze his bank account bearing No.02121000006167 in HDFC Bank, Goregaon (E),
Karnataka AAR in the case of M/s Midcon Polymers Pvt. Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s Midcon Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the Case: The applicant has proposed/ planned for engaging in the business of renting of commercial property on monthly rents and allied businesses. They intend to enter into a contractual agreement of renting of immovable property
Delhi HC in the case of Apeejay Infra-Logistics Private Limited Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Apeejay Infra-Logistics Private Limited Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The Petitioner, a private Container Freight Station [hereinafter referred to as ‘CFS’] at Haldia, West Bengal, challenges Regulation 5(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 and also
Gujarat HC in the case of JSK Sons Versus State of Gujarat
Case Covered: JSK Sons Versus State of Gujarat Facts of the Case: By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs : “(A) Your Lordship may be pleased to admit this petition: (B) Your Lordship may be pleased issue a writ of mandamus or any other appointment writ, order, and/or directions in the nature of mandamus, quashing and setting aside the provisional order of attachment said to have been issued by Respondent No.2 for attaching the Bank Accounts, as per the Table mentioned herein above at para
Bombay HC in the case of Mr. Navneet Sahay Verma
Case Covered: Mr. Navneet Sahay Verma Versus Registrar of Companies Facts of the Case: The Petitioners are directors who have been disqualified. Though the facts in each petition may slightly differ, the common relief sought at this stage by the Petitioners is to permit them
Kerala HC in the case of Cial Duty-Free And Retail Services Ltd
Case Covered: Cial Duty-Free And Retail Services Ltd Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: In writ petition bearing W.P.(C) Nos.6850 of 2018, a declaration has been sought to the effect that the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, the Integrated Goods and