GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s Educational Initiative Pvt. Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s Educational Initiative Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the Case: M/s. Education Initiatives Pvt. Ltd. is a private limited company registered under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 and having a GSTIN: 24AADCS0861R1ZZ is a company filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section
Gujarat AAR in the case of Nishith Vipinchandra Shah Pooja Enteroprise
Case Covered: Nishith Vipinchandra Shah Pooja Enteroprise Facts of the Case: M/s. Pooja Enteroprise, 1st Phase, J-14, Old Type Shed, GIDC Vapi, Gujarat, having a GSTIN No.24AAGPPS6774E1ZV, is a company filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s. Adarsh Plant Protect Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s. Adarsh Plant Protect Ltd. Facts of the case: The applicant M/s. Adarsh Plant Protect Ltd. vide their application for Advance Ruling has submitted that they are engaged in the manufacturing of Sprayer Pumps and Adarsh Clean Stove and Adarsh Clean Cook Stove
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s. Novozymes South Asia Pvt. Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s. Novozymes South Asia Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the Case: The applicant vides their application for Advance Ruling has submitted that they are engaged in the manufacture and taxable supply of biofertilizers namely RhizoMyx and Rhyizomyco. They have stated that mycorrhiza & endomycorrhiza
Maharashtra AAR in the case of M/s. Tata Motors Limited
Case Covered: M/s. Tata Motors Limited Facts of the Case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and the
Karnataka AAAR in the case of Sri. Taghar Vasudeva Ambrish
Case Covered: Sri. Taghar Vasudeva Ambrish Facts of the case: Taghar Vasudeva Ambrish (hereinafter referred to as “the applicant”) along with four other namely, Mrs. M.C. Nagarathna, Mr. T.V. Ambarish, Mr. T.V. Nagaraj & Mr. T.V. Anjan (“joint owners”) have collectively leased out a multi-storied
Delhi HC in the case of Jayalakshmi Jaitly Versus Centra Bureau of Investigation
Case Covered: Jayalakshmi Jaitly Versus Centra Bureau of Investigation Facts of the Case: Vide the present application, the applicant/appellant seeks suspension of sentence awarded by Trial Court vide judgment and order on sentence dated 21.07.2020 and 30.07.2020, respectively, whereby the applicant has been sentenced to undergo
Madras HC in the case of Tirunelveli District Central Cooperative Bank Limited
Case Covered: Tirunelveli District Central Cooperative Bank Limited Versus The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(TDS) Facts of the Case: The writ petitioners are Societies registered under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. They have been licensed by the Reserve Bank of India to carry
Madras HC in the case of M/s. Gangotri Textiles Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s. Gangotri Textiles Ltd. Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Facts of the Case: This appeal by the assessee filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for brevity), is directed against the order dated 26.05.2017 passed by
Gujarat HC in the case of M/s Kalpsutra Gujarat Versus The Union of India
Case Covered: M/s Kalpsutra Gujarat Versus The Union of India Facts of the Case: The draft amendment allowed. The same shall be carried out at the earliest. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a partnership firm
Karnataka AAR in the case of Mr. Rajendran Santhosh
Case Covered: Mr. Rajendran Santhosh Facts of the Case: Sri Rajendran Santhosh, (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), residing at D No. 2102, “Komalraj”, 2nd Cross, H.D.Kote.Road, Srirampura 3rd Stage, Mysuru 570023, is employed as an “independent Regional Sales Manager for the Middle East and Indian Markets”
Madras HC in the case of M/s.The Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited
Case Covered: M/s.The Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited Versus Ramesh Babu Facts of the case: The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal on hand is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2018 passed in M.C.O.P.No.27 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims