GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Gujarat HC in the case of Material Recycling Association of India
Case Covered: Material Recycling Association of India Versus Union of India Facts of the case: By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods Service Tax Act, 2017 (for
Karnataka HC in the case of M/s M.S. Retail Private Limited
Case Covered: M/s M.S. Retail Private Limited Versus The Union of India Facts of the Case: The petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the business of trading in bath fittings and sanitary ware. It was duly registered as ‘taxable person’ under the provisions
Patna HC in the case of Sanyog Construction Private Limited
Case Covered: Sanyog Construction Private Limited Versus The State of Bihar Facts of the Case: Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “I. To the respondent no. 4 to permit the Petitioner to file/upload statutory appeal on the GST web portal under section 107 of
Kerala HC in the case of Rajive And Company Versus The Assistant Commissioner
Case Covered: Rajive And Company Versus The Assistant Commissioner Facts of the Case: The petitioners have approached this Court through the present writ petitions at various stages during an investigation that is ongoing into the affairs of the petitioners under the GST Act, at the instance
Madras HC in the case of Tvl. Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint venture
Case Covered: Tvl.Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint venture Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: At the heart of this batch of writ petitions is the question of whether the Petitioners are entitled to a refund of the entire unutilized input tax credit that each of
Madras HC in the case of M/s. Jay Jay Mills (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s. Jay Jay Mills (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus The State Tax Officer Facts of the Case: The petitioner herein had exported Knitwear and Knitted Fabric, which amounts to zero-rated supply and in terms of Section 16(3) of the IGST Act, 2017, had applied
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s. Global Vectra Helicorp Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s. Global Vectra Helicorp Ltd. Facts of the Case: The applicant M/s. Global Vectra Helicorp ltd. vide their application for Advance Ruling has submitted that they are having their registered office at A54, Kailash Colony, New Delhi-110048 and GST registered office at Airports
Rajasthan AAR in the case of M/s. Crown Tours and Travels
Case Covered: M/s. Crown Tours and Travels Facts of the Case: Crown Tours and Travels (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Applicant’) is engaged in the business of providing tour services to the tourists identified by the Main Tour Operator. In a transaction that the Applicant
Madras HC in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Versus M/s.Hitachi Power
Case Covered: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Versus M/s.Hitachi Power Europe GmbH Facts of the Case: This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order in W.P.No.3706 of 2019 dated 17.02.2020, filed by the 1st respondent-Company seeking to quash the order passed by the 2nd
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s. Dipak Kumar Ramjibhai Patel
Case Covered: M/s. Dipak Kumar Ramjibhai Patel Facts of the Case: The applicant M/s. Dipak Kumar Ramjibhai Patel (Shree Mahalaxmi Cement products) vide their application for Advance Ruling has submitted that they are a proprietorship concern, engaged in the manufacturing of Fly Ash Bricks and
Delhi HC in the case of Mohd Nashruddin Khan Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Mohd Nashruddin Khan Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The above-mentioned petitioners have preferred their respective writ petitions to seek similar reliefs. The underlying facts in these three cases are also similar, and stem out of – more or less, the
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s V 2 Realty
Case Covered: M/s V 2 Realty Facts of the Case: The applicant submitted that they are engaged in the construction business. Their project V2 Signature is going on at Chala, Vapi. The ground and First Floor in all wings of their project are commercial shops.