Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
Supreme Court Sets Out Framework for High Courts to Supervise Expedient Resolution of Cases Involving MPs/MLAs
Simultaneously, the bench has issued the subsequent comprehensive directives for overseeing the expeditious resolution of pending cases: Chief Justices of High Courts shall initiate the registration of a suo motu case titled “In Re Designated Courts for MPs/MLAs” to oversee the prompt resolution of pending
245 petitions disposed of for time barred appeals by Orrissa High court
Orissa HC takes note of the recent notification no.53/2023- Central Tax ( ‘ Amnesty Scheme’ for the time barred appeals) and sets aside the orders under challenge in a batch of writ petiitions, remanding the cases back to the commissioner ( appeals) for denovo consideration.
The Bombay High Court nullifies the FAO order issued two years after the DRP directive concerning Vodafone Idea.
The proceedings stem from Vodafone Idea’s Return of Income (ROI) for the Assessment Year 2016–2017, which initially reflected a loss. Seeking a refund of prepaid taxes amounting to Rs. 1128.47 crore, encompassing tax deductions at source and advance tax, the petitioner filed this claim. The
GST LitigationExtended meaning of governmental authority was adopted by the court
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX V/s M/S SHAPOORJI PALLONJI AND COMPANY PVT. LTD Citations: Barun Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors Bihar State Electricity Board vs. Pulak Enterprises & Ors ONGC
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 9, 2023
ITC for purchase from Non existent seller cant be recovered in case of a composition dealer
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/S Rama Brick Field Vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 And 2 Others Facts of the cases: Purchase of coal was made from Rohit Coal Traders for which tax invoice was issued in which CGST and SGST was
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 9, 2023Once the registration is granted it can be cancelled only as per section 29(2)
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/S Shyam Sundar Sita Ram Traders Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others citations: TDRS Wood Products Lucknow vs State of U.P. and other Marketing Private Limited vs State of U.P. and others Facts of the
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 9, 2023
GST LitigationOpportunity of being heard is right of taxpayer even if they chose no for it
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/S Brijesh Kumar Singh V/s State Of U.P Citations: Bharat Mint & Allied Chemicals Vs. Commissioner Commerical Tax & 2 Or Hitech Sweet Water Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat, Facts of the cases: Solitary
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 9, 2023
GST LitigationDepartment cant reject the transaction value if can’t prove that invoice value is incorrect
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Versus M/S GANPATI OVERSEAS Facts of the cases: The appeals have been filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai under Section 130-E of the Customs Act, 1962 against the common judgment and
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 9, 2023Supreme Court is contesting a High Court ruling that declined to establish a specific timeframe for the Governor’s approval of bills.
The Kerala Government has taken its case to the Supreme Court, challenging a High Court judgment that dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) brought by a lawyer. This PIL contested the actions of the Governor of Kerala, Arif Mohammed Khan, who was withholding bills passed
Section 35 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 35 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita on Text : . Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 37, to defend— (a) his own body, and the body of any other person, against any offence affecting the human body; (b)
Whether online gaming is an actionable claim?
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: NXGN SPORTS INTERACTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA citation: Varun Gumber vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others Chandresh Sankhla vs State of Rajasthan and Others Facts of the cases: Perusal of the show cause
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 9, 2023Section 32 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 31 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita on Text : Except murder, and offences against the State punishable with death, nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is compelled to do it by threats, which, at the time of doing it, reasonably