Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
Whether online gaming is an actionable claim?
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: NXGN SPORTS INTERACTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA citation: Varun Gumber vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others Chandresh Sankhla vs State of Rajasthan and Others Facts of the cases: Perusal of the show cause
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 9, 2023Calcutta High Court extends bail to NDPS accused, citing the absence of a forensic report
Although the charge-sheet was submitted within the stipulated 180-day timeframe, it appeared to be a mere formality, not reflecting true adherence to the provisions of the statute. Section 37 of the NDPS Act demands strict interpretation, as it pertains to an individual’s fundamental rights and
Issue related to SCN jurisdiction, case listed for next date
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: MS SURYA BUSINEES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM Citations: Indo International Tobacco Ltd. v. Vivek Prasad and Ors Facts of the cases: In this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed a Show Cause
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 8, 2023
GST LitigationGST DRC01B shall be issued before recovery proceedings
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Caterpillar India Private Limited V/s Assistant Commissioner, Office Facts of the cases: The petitioner has now filed this writ petition challenging the recovery notice dated 13.09.2023. The challenge to the impugned recovery notice is primarily on
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 8, 2023
GST LitigationIntention to evade tax is mandatory for penalty u/s 129 (Pdf Attach)
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Rumki Biswas V/s Senior Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Budge Budge Charge & anr. Facts of the cases: The case of the appellant is that they had generated part A of the e-way bill on 22nd March,
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 8, 2023
GST ComplianceUltraTech Cement has been issued an order for a GST demand and associated penalty totaling Rs 2.28 crore.
The company intends to pursue legal action in response to the aforementioned order, as it has already deposited the differential duty with interest, yet the authority has failed to acknowledge this. During the quarter ending on September 30, 2023, the company reported an impressive increase
Section 29 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 26 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita on TEXT : The exceptions in sections 21, 22 and 23 do not extend to acts which are offences independently of any harm which they may cause, or be intended to cause, or be known to be likely to
[update] Registration cant be kept suspended for long time
The case is updated on 12-01-2024. The updated copy is attached here. The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/S TESZLA MULTI TRADE Versus UNION OF INDIA Facts of the cases: It appears that the petitioner has been issued Show Cause Notice for
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 8, 2023
GST LitigationITC cant be denied for a technical error in return (pdf Attach)
The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/S BODAL CHEMICALS LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA Citation: M/s. Vishnu Aroma Pouching Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Union of India Facts of the cases: “(A) That Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a Writ of
CA Shafaly GirdharwalNov 8, 2023SC decided to not to proceed with SLP due to threshold of 2 cr in Income tax matter
Considering the minimal notice provided and the relatively low tax amount in question, we are disinclined to adjudicate the current special leave petition. This stance aligns with Circular No. 17/2019, dated August 8, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue,
Section 27 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 27 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita on TEXT : Nothing which is done in good faith for the benefit of a person under twelve years of age, or of person with mental illness, by or by consent, either express or implied, of the guardian or
Section 30 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 30 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita on TEXT : Nothing is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause to a person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, even without that person’s consent, if the circumstances are such that