Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
GST Compliance“When Filing GSTR 1 for October 2023 Using Summary Generation”
“The system is currently undergoing compliance checks for Form DRC-01C. If you encounter the message ‘Please try to file GSTR1 again after some time,’ rest assured that this can affect both NIL and non-NIL returns for various clients on a random basis. It may not
GST LitigationTRAI clarified that 90 days gap is kept before making allotment of a deactivated number
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has informed the Supreme Court that, following deactivation due to non-usage or at the subscriber’s request, a cellular mobile phone number remains unallocated to a new subscriber for a minimum period of 90 days. WhatsApp also conveyed to
Section 10 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 10 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of
8 Important clarification by Delhi GST department related to the issuance of notice
The Delhi GST department has taken the cognisance at many issues related to the notices in GST. The notices were issued in cases where the adjudication was already done via scrutiny or Audit. The department has asked to withdraw the notices in these cases. Also
Section 9 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 9 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: (1) Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the
Section 8 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 8 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: (1) Where no sum is expressed to which a fine may extend, the amount of fine to which the offender is liable is unlimited, but shall not be
Section -6 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 6 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: In calculating fractions of terms of punishment, imprisonment for life shall be reckoned as equivalent to imprisonment for twenty years unless otherwise provided.
Section -7 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860
Section 7 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: In every case in which an offender is punishable with imprisonment which may be of either description, it shall be competent to the Court which sentences such offender
The short time given for hearing is not equal to opportunity of being heard
Thus, as already stated supra, the notice calling forth the petitioner’s reply to be filed within a limited time cannot be deemed to a notice affording fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Had it been the real intention of the respondent Department to provide
GST LitigationCJI requested lawyers to not to take too many adjournments
The Chief Justice of India (CJI) presented compelling data revealing a substantial number of adjournment requests, underscoring the inefficiency of this practice. CJI Chandrachud made a fervent plea to legal practitioners, urging them to request adjournments only when absolutely essential, underscoring the vital importance of
GST LitigationWomen reservation cant be implemented immediately- SC (Pdf Attach)
On November 3, the Supreme Court expressed reservations regarding the immediate implementation of the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023, which proposes women’s reservation in the Lok Sabha, state legislative upper houses, and the Delhi legislative assembly, before the 2024 general elections. While
GST LitigationSC express concern over electoral bonds
During the concluding session of arguments in the case pertaining to the Electoral Bonds Scheme, the Supreme Court raised a critical question to the Union Government. They inquired whether there were intentions to amend the Companies Act to reintroduce a profit percentage-based limit on corporate