ConsultEase Logo
Now live: ConsultEase AppExpert advice, on demand
Know more
App Store
Google Play
App Logo

Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.

Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.

5,253 articlesShowing 12 of 5,253
📋ROC Litigation

The short time given for hearing is not equal to opportunity of being heard

Thus, as already stated supra, the notice calling forth the petitioner’s reply to be filed within a limited time cannot be deemed to a notice affording fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Had it been the real intention of the respondent Department to provide

New amnesty scheme for belated appeals is not applicable on all noticesGST Compliance

New amnesty scheme for belated appeals is not applicable on all notices

S.O. 4767(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies taxable persons who could not

C
ConsultEase
Nov 3, 2023
Benefit of amnesty should be provided even if after or before the period given in schemeGST Consultancy

Benefit of amnesty should be provided even if after or before the period given in scheme

The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/s.GMR Enterprises Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, Citations: Tvl.Suguna Cut piece Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner Facts of the cases: A writ was filed to quash the cancellation of registration. This writ petition is filed for writ

Bail granted to Chartered Accountant in PMLA CaseFIR & Bail

Bail granted to Chartered Accountant in PMLA Case

The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: MANISH KOTHARI Vs DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPT. OF REVENUE HEADQUARTER INVESTIGATION UNIT Citations: Sanjay Pandey v. Directorate of Enforcement2022 SCC Ranjit Singh Brahamjeet Singh Sharma v. State of Maharastra Mohd. Muslim Hussain vs.

Court denied the bail for apprehension of illegal detail/arrest of appellantFIR & Bail

Court denied the bail for apprehension of illegal detail/arrest of appellant

The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: ASHISH MITTAL Vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR Citations: Union of India vs. Kunisetty Satyanarayana Special Director vs. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse Kirit Shrimankar vs. Union of India, Virbhadra Singh vs. Enforcement Directorate & Ors. State of

Judgment of Pankaj Bansal for ground of arrest in PMLA is applicable retrospectivelyFIR & Bail

Judgment of Pankaj Bansal for ground of arrest in PMLA is applicable retrospectively

The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: Roop Bansal Vs Union of India and another Citations: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Versus Union of India & Ors Pankaj Bansal Versus Union of India and others Arnab Manoranjan Goswami versus State of Maharashtra and others Union

📋FIR & Bail

Section -4 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860

Section 4 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to  same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: The punishments to which offenders are liable under the provisions of this Sanhita are— (a) Death; (b) Imprisonment for life, that is to say, imprisonment for remainder of

C
ConsultEase
Nov 2, 2023
Why SC rejected the bail of Ex. Delhi CM , Manish Sisodia even when he is not proven guilty yetFIR & Bail

Why SC rejected the bail of Ex. Delhi CM , Manish Sisodia even when he is not proven guilty yet

The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: MANISH SISODIA Vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Citations: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and Others v. Union of India and Others Ravinder Singh v. State of Haryana Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan Y. Balaji v. Karthik Desari

The notice is returned as unclaimed, it shall be deemed to be servedGST Litigation

The notice is returned as unclaimed, it shall be deemed to be served

The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: PRIYANKA KUMARI V/s SHAILENDRA KUMAR Citations: K.Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Another, Ajeet Seeds Limited Vs. K. Gopala Krishnaiah Facts of the cases: A notice was sent to the petitioner. But it was not received

📋FIR & Bail

Section -3 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860

Section 1 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to the same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: (1) Throughout this Sanhita every definition of an offence, every penal provision, and every Illustration of every such definition or penal provision shall be understood subject to

C
ConsultEase
Nov 2, 2023
The reply of taxpayer should be considered before passing the order (Pdf Attach)Contracts & Disputes

The reply of taxpayer should be considered before passing the order (Pdf Attach)

The public_profile can be reached at shaifaly.ca@gmail.com Cases Covered: M/s.The Chennai Silks, Vs The Assistant Commissioner Facts of the cases: The respondent sent a reminder DRC-01A on 10.3.2022. Thereafter, DRC-01 show cause notice dated 17.4.2023 was issued and the personal hearing was fixed on

📋FIR & Bail

Section -5 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to same provision in IPC Act 1860

Section 5 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as compared to  same provision in IPC Act 1860 on Text: In every case in which sentence of,–– (a) death has been passed, the appropriate Government may, without the consent of the offender, commute the punishment for any other

C
ConsultEase
Nov 2, 2023